@gabriel @toiletpaper what u describe there is that the government have become effectively anti-democratic. I don't want to derail this by talking about the election but I think a lot of commentary now is flawed, many commentators seem to be trying to rally people behind trump, are making it seem as tho, wow look how many ppl snubbed the democratic party who spent more money, the people must be smarter than we thought in rejecting the corporate influence.

THEY DIDN'T REJECT THE CORPORATE INFLUENCE they saw it, watched it listened to it and simply lashed out against it. If they have folk reacting with hate and anger, the corporates win. the big success of the corporates was being able to slip harris in without debate. if ppl pushed to question that heavily i think its possible a real democratic process could have happened. corporate donors may have paid a tiny bit more to Harris, but it think it was just to create a sense of validity around her. She was a nothing person for 3.75 years and so they had to compensate for that by throwing a bit extra 'money' around. I feel that there was a hatred of the falseness of that positioning that was able to be weaponized and used, to herd folk back toward trump, and the alleged 'assasination' attempts. I still havent seen any reporting on how JillStein or even RFK went but, i sense that if people REALLY were to reject the corporate influence they would first IGNORE it. They'd not have gotten swept up in the narratives that were clearly aimed at reverse psychology and herding folk toward trump. Remember that so much airtime was given FREELY to trump so he didn't need to spend as much "money" if we are even going to call the currency money (thats another topic).

As i say i'd like to be able to find an thical source that describes the election results of all the parties including Stein and RFK, but I do think the corporate media were not rejected in this election. Since I tooted #MattTaibbi a couple days ago, i have since thought he's wrong. I sense folk were successfully herded into the uniparty yet again and the 3 or so billion in record 'spending', with more of that 'money' going to harris, is really a smokescreen for the dirty tricks that allowed the anti-democratic theater called an 'election' to operate, unchallenged.

We already know that RFK was deliberately sidelined, he tried to get 30-40 interviews and was almost completely ignored, with just 2. This is someone who had 24% of the vote at the start of 2024! .....and how could he be an anti-semite, because after Oct 7 he came out as effectively a genocide supporter, basically. So nothing adds up. There was clear corporate election intereference and dirty tricks to engineer the election. And i haven't even touched on bigtech and their support for the uniparty.

i find that ppl who understand the importance of how money is created use the best vocabulary to handle false government, and false authority. I dont believe there is such a thing as anti-capitalist, there are only people on a sliding scale of how much they want. Ppl who dont want many material things can seem less capitalistic. Even an anti-capitalist will want a small space to themselves for a time.