Brendan Carr ‘Launches’ His Bogus FCC ‘Review’ Of ABC Broadcast Licenses And It’s Just Pathetic And Stupid

https://fed.brid.gy/r/https://www.techdirt.com/2026/05/01/brendan-carr-launches-his-bogus-fcc-review-of-abc-broadcast-licenses-and-its-just-pathetic-and-stupid/

testing only, don't watch this

https://watch.linuxrenaissance.com/w/hZb8znmCU8xFsBF9jM4yfh

Athletics Ireland: New Coaching Database and License System. “Athletics Ireland is pleased to announce the launch of its new Coaching Database and License System, designed to enhance the support, recognition, and governance of coaching across the organisation. … Under the new system, all coaches who are registered members of Athletics Ireland, hold a Level 2 or Level 3 coaching qualification, […]

Missouri sets sights on establishing licensed cannabis research

https://fed.brid.gy/r/https://missouriindependent.com/briefs/missouri-sets-sights-on-establishing-licensed-cannabis-research/

Me siento un poquito defraudado. Todo este tiempo me hablaron de que el FOSS era la única manera de que el software sea seguro, sólido y auditable. Open source, software libre, GPL, MIT...

Pero hay un **silencio** incómodo en la comunidad: no se habla casi nunca de las licencias Polyform. El código está disponible, puede auditarse y mejorarse. Tiene un sistema completo de opciones que cualquier creador valora, por ejemplo: "no puedes usar este software para competir contra mí y mis productos". Es razonable aunque ¿adivinen qué? Esto no le gusta a la gente del FOSS, que insisten en que "si no pueden competir contra ti porque lo creaste, entonces no es libre" (sí, a pesar de que sea transparente, seguro, lo usen gratis, lo puedan modificar, sea colaborativo y comunitario, eso no importa).

De mi parte, me siento más alineado con esta visión y estoy planteándome usar estas licencias (siento que son lo que buscaba):

https://polyformproject.org/licenses/

#Polyform #Available #Code #Licenses

I also like the ACAB license

Quote: "No business entity where the ratio of pay (salaried, freelance, stocks, or other benefits) between the highest and lowest individual in the entity is greater than 50 : 1 may use the work for any reason."

but it's not really applicable to this project.

#software #licenses

Been working on an open source thing. yada yada yada - which license to pick? MIT is the obvious choice but has the big problem that it is ethically indifferent. If I do not want my project to be used for bad and evil things, what do I do?

Hippocratic License? Do No Harm License?

Thoughts?

#ethics #software #licenses