A New Zealand mountain is granted personhood, recognizing it as sacred for Māori

A mountain in New Zealand considered an ancestor by Indigenous people has been recognized as a legal person after a new law granted it all the rights and responsibilities of a human being. Mount Taranaki — now known as Taranaki Maunga, its Māori name — is the latest natural feature to be granted personhood in New Zealand, which has ruled that a river and a stretch of sacred land are people before. The law fulfils a 2023 settlement between the government and Māori which provided redress for land theft and other British Crown breaches of New Zealand’s founding treaty during colonization. The pristine, snow-capped dormant volcano is the second highest on New Zealand’s North Island.

AP News

/1 thread: Environmental personhood
https://mastodon.social/@persagen/113822022448011233

l/w Citizens United/rel. U.S. campaign finance law est. legal rights of Corporations as legal persons entitled to lobbying/free speech (campaign finance; amicus curiae), ...

That flood of dark money (Leonard Leo/conservative Christian|libertarian billionaires) w. conservative supermajority U.S. Supreme Court in large part responsible for current state of U.S. politics/law/political economy

#SCOTUS #GOP #Trrump2 #fascism #LegalPerson

Nature Goes to Court
https://www.ipsnews.net/2025/01/nature-goes-court

* natures takes stand in climate litigation
* courtrooms worldwide battleground for Earth’s rights
* environment as plaintiff demanding justice/accountability
* benefits humanity

India's top court: Pollution-free environment a fundamental right
https://www.reuters.com/world/india/pollution-free-environment-fundamental-right-indias-top-court-says-2024-10-23

#environmentalism #EnvironmentalRights #EnvironmentalHealth #ClimateChange #ClimateLitigation
#LegalPerson #LegalPersonhood #MagpieRiver #EnvironmentalPersonhood
#Indigenous #autonomy

Nature Goes to Court

Nature is taking the stand as courtrooms worldwide become battlegrounds for Earth’s rights. The rise in climate litigation shows how the environment can take centre stage as a plaintiff, demanding justice and accountability, benefiting us all. On 23 October 2024, India’s Supreme Court declared a pollution-free environment a fundamental right, underscoring the government’s duty to …

Inter Press Service

Indigenous tribe regaining control of ancestral lands while fighting climate change
https://mastodon.social/@persagen/112899057042227042

* f. dismantling dams to restoring land rights, Yurok tribe better able to protect their environment
* note also Magpie River (legal personhood)
* ...

#environmentalism #EnvironmentalRights #EnvironmentalHealth #ClimateChange #LegalPerson #LegalPersonhood #MagpieRiver #EnvironmentalPersonhood
#Indigenous #autonomy

[thread] Environmental personhood
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Environmental_personhood

* legal concept which designates certain environmental entities the status of a legal person
* assigns to these entities, rights, protections, privileges, responsibilities & legal liability of a legal person
* in court, a "guardian" can act on the entity's behalf to protect it
* may recognize Indigenous relationships to natural entities e.g. rivers

#environmentalism #EnvironmentalRights #LegalPerson #EnvironmentalPersonhood #indigenous

Environmental personhood - Wikipedia

@metin

Good quote. Chomsky has some keen insights.

I'm not an accountant or a lawyer, but that won't keep me from offering some related opinions here. Sorry this will be slightly US-centric, though I won't be surprised if there are echoes elsewhere.

I assume he's talking about tax deductibility of advertising for business as an ordinary and necessary business expense.

There are those of us who think that corporations should not be "legal people", trying to get rights that were created for people, not corporations. The flip side of this that gets far less attention is that corporations have rights people do not.

The "ordinary and necessary business expense" means that there is an activity fundamental to the core of the existence of a company's interests. The scrutiny is MUCH higher for individuals, who may feel their own core identity needs some advertising, EVEN IF it is not a business.

And so ordinary and necessary expenses of simply being alive are not deductible by human people, which seems an abomination. It's ridiculous. For example, interest on loans including high interest credit cards is not deductible by ordinary humans.

It used to be, but that right went away. It is a privilege of the rich now. You can deduct interest related to loans secured against your house. That sounds good, said that way, if you think it's intended to incentivize you to invest in your house. But an implication is that if I buy a pleasure yacht and secure the loan against my house, I can deduct the interest. But if I make ACTUAL upgrades to my home and pay for them on a credit card that is NOT secured against my home, I cannot deduct it.

So, back to the quote, we pay in other ways that are related but more subtle. We are told and eventually come to believe that the "ordinary and necessary expense" thing is a strong argument for justifying that OF COURSE such expenses cannot be seen as "profit". And yet we are routinely taxed in our ordinary lives in ways that are OBVIOUSLY not profit to ourselves, that are obviously taxes on our existence, and that is apparently not obviously something we should get as a reason not to be taxed.

Related reading: My 2009 essay Credit Cards: A Tax on "Being Poor", where I argue that this kind of disparity creates "double taxation" on private individuals.
http://netsettlement.blogspot.com/2009/01/credit-cards-a-tax-on-being-poor.html

#CreditCards #deductible #deductibility #taxation #DoubleTaxation #LegalPerson #corporations

Credit Cards: A Tax on “Being Poor”

Seeing credit cards as double-taxation: a non-deductible private tax paid to a private government to get a private safety net.

In DNC Speech, Sanders Says Overturning “Citizens United” Should Be a Priority

Outside groups have already spent more than $1 billion on federal elections this cycle, far outpacing previous years.

Truthout

@breadandcircuses @cristinah

Corporations do commonly use their power to magnify the speech of individuals that control them. See my essay Employers of Religion, the third in a three-part series that beings with Corporations Are Not People
http://netsettlement.blogspot.com/2013/12/corporations-are-not-people.html

NOTE: Google has recently marked part 3 as violating its terms of service. I am at a loss for knowing why, but my best guess is that this is political suppression of speech about corporations. There is nothing I know to be offensive in this article, though it does seek to deny alleged "freedom of religion" to corporations per se, and maybe someone has twisted that into some sense of my writings being intolerant, when in fact I am fussing about corporations doing that.

Make your own decision about whether to proceed past Google's warning, but this post existed for many years in public without anyone citing a problem:
http://netsettlement.blogspot.com/2013/12/employers-of-religion.html
I've included the most important quote as an image on this post, though, in case you're feeling shy.

#corporations #capitalism #LegalPersonhood #LegalPerson #LegalPeople #rights

Corporations Are Not People

Kent Pitman's blog. Independent, progressive views on Society, Technology, Social Justice and Climate, or sometimes poetry, philosophy, or history.

@alter_kaker @breadandcircuses Regarding the metaphor of sociopathy, I'm using it because it specifically is associated with lack of conscience. I have no mental health credential, so my use is purely descriptive from a lay point of view.

I don't by using this term mean to suggest per se irrationality (an inability to reason) as might come with some actual mental disorders. We're speaking metaphorically here, and metaphors are not literal equivalences. But rather I mean the kind of reckless indifference and appearance of actual cruelty that results in a weirdly logical way if you steadfastly fail (or refuse) to consider moral questions.

This is an artifact particularly of shareholder capitalism. Stakeholder capitalism is better. See my essay Losing the War in a Quiet Room.
http://netsettlement.blogspot.com/2019/09/losing-ground-in-environment.html

#capitalism #ShareholderCapitalism #StakeholderCapitalism #LegalPersonhood #LegalPerson #LegalPeople #conscience #ethics #morality

Losing Ground in the Environment

Essay on how we can't still see the world as an infinite resource. Things are interconnected and finite, so we need a fresh mindset when planning.

#lawmastodon #University #law #animallaw
It seems it's time for #intros. I'm Associate Professor of Jurisprudence at the University of Helsinki. I work mainly in legal philosophy and animal law. I've published especially on legal personhood.

I tweet... (wait... toot?) mainly in English and Finnish.

#legalperson #animallaw #legalpersonhood #jurisprudence #legalphilosophy #introductions