#ToddBlanche like no good attorney ever, tells a Federal Judge "You're not the boss of me" and thus confirms the illegal "Anti-Weaponization Fund"/#Jan6 #SlushFund is a going concern if they would just turn off the spotlights so the conspirators can plot some more.
In Floyd v. Department of Justice (1:26-cv-01399) District Court, E.D. Virginia https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/73383692/floyd-v-department-of-justice/ Doc 93 is a refusal of Todd Blanche + two others to swear under oath that the "Anti-Weaponization Fund" is 100% dead and never to be revived, which was the condition Judge Brinkema gave in the order (Doc 85) before the case could be called moot.
> to avoid any further litigation in this civil action, defendants Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche, Associate Attorney General Stanley Woodward, Jr., and Secretary of the Treasury Scott Bessent FILE a declaration under the penalty of perjury that they will not take any action to create or operate the Anti-Weaponization Fund, and that the Anti-Weaponization Fund will not proceed in any manner, or under any name.
— Order of District Judge Brinkema, Doc 85, 2026/06/12
Well, they didn't do it.
> the Court’s demands are unnecessary. And its presumption that mootness can arise only by compelling testimony from three senior government officials “implicate[s] separation of powers concerns”
I believe the Court's demands *are* necessary. And I think we need all three of them because two of them might be liars. What do you think?







