This elaborates on the #NinthCircuit's 1996 *Maljack Prods v Goodtimes Home Video Corp*:
> [Trademark][ cannot be used to circumvent copyright law. If material covered by copyright law has passed into the public domain, it cannot then be protected by the #LanhamAct without rendering the Copyright Act a nullity.
19/
PSA: To be "famous" for the purposes of federal antidilution law, the mark has to be "widely recognized by the general consuming public of the United States as a designation of source of the goods or services of the mark’s owner."
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/15/1125
Your mark basically has to be a "household name."
Niche fame is NOT enough.
German American Law Journal - US-Recht auf Deutsch is the German-language edition of the law journal published since 1991, daily covering American law developments in German.
The U.S. Supreme Court has granted cert in the #BadSpaniels #trademark infringement & #dilution case.
Background & case filings here: https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/jack-daniels-properties-inc-v-vip-products-llc-2/
SCOTUS grants cert in two new IP cases:
1) Abitron Austria v. Hetronic Int'l: Lanham Act & extraterritorial sales
https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/abitron-austria-gmbh-v-hetronic-international-inc/
2) Amgen Inc. v. Sanofi: Patents & full-scope enablement: https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/amgen-inc-v-sanofi-2/