I find the paper "Arguments from Ignorance, Coverage, and Bubbles" by Patrick Bondy in the latest issue of Informal Logic very useful.
In practice "ignorance" is much more important than "epistemological virtue".
#logic #fallacies #informallogic
https://informallogic.ca/index.php/informal_logic/article/view/9706/6263
Informaalisen logiikan uranuurtajiin kuuluvan Trudy Govierin uusi koostekirja ilimaatteks saavavilla, https://windsor.scholarsportal.info/omp/index.php/wsia/catalog/book/454
Kirjoittajan julkaisuja PhilPapersissa, https://philpeople.org/profiles/trudy-rose-govier
#informalLogic #logic #argument #argumentation #reasoning #thinking #criticalThinking #openAccess #epistemology #philosophy #paattely #argumentointi #filosofia #kirja #govier #wsia
Leo Groarke has revised his SEP-entry on Informal Logic, https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/logic-informal/
The 2019 WSIA-volume on Informal Logic mentioned at the introduction is a nice additional resource, https://windsor.scholarsportal.info/omp/index.php/wsia/catalog/book/123, and the Journal Informal Logic offers a glimpse of some current discussions, https://informallogic.ca/index.php/informal_logic
Groarke's entry provides a list of OIR's, https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/logic-informal/#Oth, including to the hilarious Arguer's Lexicon, https://web.colby.edu/arguerslexicon/, and some entries in the Bibliography are available online.
#logic #informalLogic #argument #argumentation #reasoning #epistemology #tietoteoria #philosophy #filosofia #ajattelu #thinking #science #rhetoric #abduction #sep #pseudoScience
Informal Logicin numero 4/2025 näkyy ilmestyneen Joulun alla, https://informallogic.ca/index.php/informal_logic
Sisällysluettelosta selviää, mitä olisi tarjolla, ja abstrakteista saa lisävihiä. Tiededenialistiseen nyky-populismiin saattaisi osua visuimmin Gustavo Picazon pohdinta hevonpaska-argumentoinnin taksonomian kehittelystä, https://informallogic.ca/index.php/informal_logic/article/view/8117?
#logic #informalLogic #epistemology #bullshit #science #reasoning #argumentation #evaluation #tiede #filosofia #philosophy #journal #denialism
@dustcircle At the same time, there have been antidotes, freely available (but not on short videos), https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Clear_Thinking/Curriculum
Uusi numero Informal Logic -journaalissa on ilmestynyt, https://informallogic.ca/index.php/informal_logic
Sisältää mm. pohdintaa false dilemman virheellisyydestä, argumenttien hyveteoreettisesta arvioinnista, syvistä erimielisyyksistä, selitysten justifioivuudesta sekä jatkoa keskusteluun argumenteilla argumentoinnista.
Pois-pääteltynä muistetaan päättelyvirheiden ja fiktion logiikkaa tutkinutta ja tietoteorian matematisoinnista haaveillutta John Woodsia.
#informalLogic #argument #argumentation #logic #epistemology #filosofia #philosophy #new #falseDilemma #virtueEpistemology #disagreements #explanations #reasoning
@tg9541 I haven't checked the contents of the new IL-issue yet. Not sure when I can. One article, however, the one about argumentation and change of minds, brought to my mind a short comment I made to Catarina Dutilh Novaes's 2023 article with an almost identical title: https://mastodontti.fi/@lupposofi/110628576055189639
#argument #argumentation #informalLogic #persuasion #changeOfMind
@[email protected] Food for thought, certainly, though somewhat depressing. Arguments begin to seem like scalpels, which can heal only after tedious preparations. I'm not comfortable with the SET-framework (too much "capitalism", play, and courtship), but promise to recheck at least the SEP-entry on Trust, https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/trust/. And of course the whole SEA-project interests a retired professional wonderer even without social rewards. 😉 #argument #epistemology #philosophy
The latest issue of #InformalLogic presents several articles dealing with "argument" at the boundary of logic, psychology and sociology.
This is of interest to anyone working in a community of knowledge, or on the matter of "truth" in the social.
Thanks to @Lupposofi for pointing me to the journal. Subscription is free.
#philosophy #psychology #sociology #science #law #argument #truth
https://informallogic.ca/index.php/informal_logic/issue/view/822
In Informal Logic 4/2023 Harvey Siegel defends a pluralistic epistemic conception of argumentation, https://informallogic.ca/index.php/informal_logic/article/view/7667
Other articles in the new/current issue argue against, for, and maybe by that, https://informallogic.ca/index.php/informal_logic
Chocolate ice cream and vanilla ice cream certainly do not contradict each other. I’m not even sure they can be said to be contraries in any clear way
Thomas
Lupposofi
dB Cooper