Management overhead of vcf9 is kinda insane.
There is literally nothing running on this box except for all of the vcf9 management components (+2 DNS servers with alpine linux that I count as management infrastructure for this as well)
Maybe I'll try Harvester again after all. Even though it also had a lot of overhead it didn't have nearly as much...
And the setup failed yet again. So my former point of #Harvester being anything but production ready appears to be even more true now...
/cc @opensuse
I think I'll throw #Harvester away again. It's just not production ready yet. Maybe give it another year or five.
+ Wait until they actually fix bugs instead of stale closing and ignoring them.
/cc @opensuse
To others that played around with #Harvester, is it's performance just shit (compared to KVM on e.g. NixOS) or is there something wrong with my environment?
Harvester itself (the web interface) is quite reactive but all of the workload I try is just behaving like shit. (Currently suspecting Disk IO, but that's also not an issue with KVM on NixOS on this hardware, so...)
I can't find any documentation about setting up #IPv6 with #Harvester. Does it not support IPv6?!?
Why @opensuse, just why?!?
Soo, now comparing #Harvester to #VCF9 on this very same hardware would be interesting.
Anyone a 4TB NVME I could borrow by change 😅?
Klaus Frank