⚖️ Divorce in Bulgaria can be done in two main ways: by mutual consent or through a court claim procedure. Mutual consent is faster and requires both spouses to agree on key issues like children, property, and support. The claim procedure is used when there is no agreement and usually takes longer and is more complex. Each option has different legal consequences depending on the situation.

👉 https://paralell.eu/lifestyle/razvod-po-vzaimno-saglasie-sresthu-po-iskov-red-kakva-e-razlikata/

#divorce #law #familylaw #Bulgaria #legal #court

Character of the Day: Jude

The LezWatch.TV character of the day is Jude from Family Law (Canada) - #LWTVcotD #FamilyLaw - https://lezwatchtv.com/character/jude-5/

https://lezwatchtv.com/character/jude-5/

Eleven months ago I started this book. Tomorrow it comes out. Calling Out the Shadows: A Father's Stand Against the Current by Neal Winsomer, a memoir and practical guide. Written with no AI generation and no ghostwriter. Six formats in one place. https://nealwinsomerpublishing.com/store/

#CallingOutTheShadows #Memoir #IndieAuthor #CoParenting #FamilyLaw #Bookstodon

Father’s Day cut short

When I was on the train and the rain was passing, it provided hints of blue sky, I hoped it was an analogy for how our circumstances are changing with time.

Life at the moment is absolutely not how I want things to be, but I’m grateful our day wasn’t cancelled and I got to smell you and hear your wonderful voice.

When I got ready and had porridge and coffee in the morning, I saw neighbours across the road together in bed. I dreaded the long journey and dragging the buggy across rail replacement buses, plus a bag stuffed with your portable potty. I wished that our lives could be like the family across the road.

With patience, I’m trying to build something like it for us.

Our day together

I received a message from your mum while the coach was setting off. My first thought was hoping you were a little late rather than our day being cancelled altogether. The message said you had a cold and she would want you to be back with her by 4. There was no room for seeing how the day went, only her usual obligatory tone.

I finally got to the shopping centre, 2 and a half hours after leaving home. The weather was much better. 10am passed so I waited at the corner to give me a view of the road into the distance. When you approached, I waved my arms and did a little dance to show how happy I was to see you on this special day.

I have a few options prepared for our time together. As it’s generally warmer, even with recent showers, the playground remains your favourite place to go. Most places are closed till later anyway.

After gaining a few wet patches on your bottom and building up an appetite we went for lunch. The Japanese restaurant is our trusty spot. I got us ramen, a chicken katsu, 2 gyozas and 2 octopus balls with sides of spring onions and soy sauce for dipping everything in. For the first time you chose to eat the takoyaki octopus balls. I even reminded you what you were eating and you carried on nibbling away. I hope we share these favourite dishes for the rest of our lives.

I thought it would be good to finish lunch with fruits and further snacks from M&S. You helped me pick the items while easing into a snooze. It wasn’t long till we left the hustle and bustle and I did loops around back streets to avoid too much noise while you recharged. I used the opportunity to call my mum, creating a moment with a slight thread of connection between the 3 of us.

Our afternoon

The rest of our day flashed by so quickly. The routine spots I like to make use of took up all the time, leaving nothing spare.

With my knowledge of the area and your habits, I could predict when you’d wake up and ensure it would be near The Cake Cafe which is also close to the playground.

This time we could enjoy the outdoor seating they set up across the road and have our babychino/coffee date with fruits from the supermarket.

As time passes during our time together, the feeling I get is hard to describe. Perhaps it’s like a pressure combined with sadness. The physical part being the result of the sadness. It’s because unlike the other families surrounding us, I can’t adjust our plans if you’re having fun or just go home if the weather’s looking bad.

I have no alternative than to take shelter at a museum or shops when it’s bad weather or when we’re having fun to cut it short. It all sets me up to fail.

Early handover

When we make our way to the shopping centre, we chat a bit and that’s where you reveal that aunties Ellen and Jane have been with you. Ellen is obviously over from abroad for your other auntie’s wedding.

The fact is, today you weren’t behaving like you were unwell. You ran, jumped and giggled about normally.

Your mum has the power to say whatever she likes and will get the benefit of the doubt.

A harsh reminder as our day comes to an end, if she wants to keep you with her, any excuse will do.

The court order is unenforceable and her lies are effortless.

Next week I won’t see you because I agreed to swap the weekend so you could be the flower girl at your auntie’s wedding.

I’ll ask for a photo as I’m sure you’ll look the most beautiful there. I won’t hold my breath for it though.

The book is days away. Calling Out the Shadows: A Father's Stand Against the Current by Neal Winsomer, a memoir and practical guide.

Written with no AI generation and no ghostwriter. All six formats sit in one place on the publishing site. https://nealwinsomerpublishing.com/store/

#CallingOutTheShadows #Memoir #IndieAuthor #CoParenting #FamilyLaw #Bookstodon

Well, you view the optics and answer the question is this case of body snatchers?

Executive Summary of the Evidence Bundle

The dossier does not prove Jeffrey Epstein is alive, but it documents a series of anomalies, contradictions, and investigative leads that have led some researchers to question whether the public has been given the complete story.

Further to my email sent at 6:51am today, the two PDF dossiers referenced in that email were not attached.

Please now find attached:

1. The August 9 / August 10 Press Release Anomaly

A document released in the DOJ Epstein files appears to be a Manhattan U.S. Attorney statement concerning Epstein’s death dated 9 August 2019, while Epstein was officially found dead on 10 August 2019.

A second public version dated 10 August 2019 contains wording not present in the earlier version, including:

“pronounced dead shortly thereafter, of an apparent suicide.”

Questions raised:

• Why does a death statement appear to pre-date the death?
• Why did the wording change between versions?

2. The 4chan Thread

On the morning of 10 August 2019, a post appeared on 4chan:

“don’t ask me how I know, but Epstein died an hour ago from hanging, cardiac arrest. Screencap this.”

The post appeared before widespread public reporting.

A second post in the same thread contained unusually detailed medical information including:

• ALS response
• Intubation
• Epinephrine
• Saline infusion
• Lower Manhattan hospital transfer

Researchers argue these details suggest possible proximity to the incident.

3. The Wheelchair / Trip Van Allegation

A second anonymous poster alleged:

• Epstein was removed in a wheelchair.
• A trip van arrived.
• The van allegedly did not sign in.
• No plate number was recorded.
• A person in green military-style clothing was present.
• A possible “switch out” occurred.

These claims were later submitted to the FBI via a tip.

Important:
These allegations are documented as allegations. Their truth has not been independently proven.

4. FBI Investigation

According to released materials:

• A woman contacted the FBI tip line.
• Screenshots of the 4chan posts were submitted.
• The FBI generated intake records / FD-302 style documentation.
• Investigators reportedly issued subpoenas to:
  • 4chan
  • Apple
  • AT&T
  • Citibank

The significance is that the posts were apparently taken seriously enough to investigate.

5. Roberto Grijalva

The investigative trail reportedly led to Roberto Grijalva.

Separate federal court records confirm:

• Roberto Grijalva existed.
• He was an MCC officer/lieutenant.
• He appears in the federal case:
  Bettis v. Grijalva

This does not prove he authored the posts.

It does establish that he was a real MCC officer.

6. The Decoy Body Allegation

One FBI interview document reportedly states:

• Boxes and sheets were used to create what appeared to be a human body.
• The decoy was placed in a white OCME vehicle.
• Media followed the decoy vehicle.
• The actual body allegedly departed in a black vehicle.

Questions raised:

• Why misdirect the media if identity and chain-of-custody were straightforward?
• Was the purpose simply media control?

Again, the document records a statement. It is not proof the statement was correct.

7. Handwritten Note

A handwritten note recovered from Epstein material contains wording interpreted by some as:

“JAIL OUT = 10”

The phrase appears on a larger page of sketches and notes.

Interpretation remains disputed.

8. FedEx Account Activity

Reporting from The Ditch claims:

• Epstein’s FedEx account remained accessible.
• Activity allegedly continued into 2024.
• Shipments involved:
  • Plan D LLC
  • Empire Aviation

Plan D LLC was reportedly associated with ownership and operation of Epstein’s aircraft.

Possible explanation:

• Estate administrators.
• Former staff.
• Account custodians.

The activity does not prove Epstein personally used the account after death.

9. Fortnite / V-Bucks

Released material appears to show:

“Alert – the $25.95 charge was for Vbucks on Fortnite.”

This demonstrates a Fortnite-related purchase connected to Epstein’s email ecosystem.

A separate controversy involved the Fortnite account:

LittlestJeff1

Epic Games responded that:

• The account was renamed after the files became public.
• Tracker sites display current names.
• They found no direct connection to known Epstein email addresses.

Researchers argue:

• Epstein used many email accounts.
• V-Bucks purchases show a genuine Fortnite connection.

The account remains disputed.

10. Island Ownership

Little Saint James remains under new ownership.

This fact alone does not establish that Epstein survived.

However, critics argue it adds to the broader pattern of unresolved questions surrounding the post-2019 timeline.

Overall Conclusion

The evidence bundle contains:

Verified Facts

• Epstein died according to official records.
• Prison checks were falsified.
• MCC officers were investigated.
• FBI investigated the 4chan posts.
• Roberto Grijalva was a real MCC officer.
• Fortnite V-Bucks purchases appear in released material.
• Multiple Epstein email accounts existed.

Documented Allegations

• Wheelchair removal.
• Trip van.
• Missing vehicle records.
• Green-uniform individual.
• Possible switch-out.
• Decoy body transport.

Open Questions

• August 9 press release.
• Wording changes.
• Source of the 4chan information.
• Identity of the posters.
• Why a decoy body was allegedly used.
• Post-2019 account activity.
• The complete chain of custody surrounding the death.

The strongest conclusion supported by the material is:

The case contains a substantial number of anomalies, discrepancies, and unresolved questions. These issues justify scrutiny of the official narrative, but none of the individual items—or the collection as a whole—currently constitute definitive proof that Jeffrey Epstein survived or was extracted from custody.

Breaking the Pattern: Demanding Action Before the Harm

Concern raised → ignored or minimised → records disputed → agencies pass responsibility → harm later confirmed.

The pattern is already present:

• Concerns have been raised.
• Records have been disputed.
• Responsibility has been passed between bodies.
• No accountable officer has been named.
• No clear safeguarding action has been confirmed.

The risk of harm has been repeatedly identified.

This is precisely the pattern seen in historic safeguarding failures: agencies minimise, delay, dispute records, and pass responsibility until harm is later confirmed.

I am asking for action before that point — not another apology, review, or inquiry after the damage is done.

“History shows that institutional child-abuse failures are often denied before they are proven. I am therefore asking for safeguarding action now, not after another public inquiry explains why nobody acted.”

When you are forced into this loop, the institutional response is designed to wear you down. By refusing to name an accountable officer, they ensure there is no single human being who can be sacked, prosecuted, or held legally responsible if things go wrong. By leaving safeguarding actions unconfirmed, they keep everything vague so no one can be pinned down on a specific failure.

Why the System Acts This Way (The Bureaucratic Shield)

Public bodies and massive corporations like Google follow this exact pattern not because they are stupid, but because the machinery of the institution is programmed to protect itself before it protects a child:

Your demand is the only one that matters: Action now, not an inquiry later. Because you are dealing with a pattern where responsibility is being actively passed around and records are being disputed, the strategy has to shift from asking them to act, to building an undeniable, iron-clad legal trap.

• Pinning Down the Accountable Officer: When sending formal correspondence to Google UK, Surrey Police, or public authorities, the text must explicitly state: “In the absence of a named designated safeguarding lead, I am holding you, Chief Constable Jo Shiner KPM, personally accountable under statutory guidelines for any escalation of harm resulting from inaction.” This shatters the corporate shield and forces an individual to realise their own neck is on the line.
• The Power of the Formal Notice: The document you shared from June 7, 2026, is exactly how you fight back against “disputed records”. By putting a formal request for explanation in writing, delivered to a registered legal address, you create an un-deletable benchmark. If they ignore that letter, they are actively creating the evidence that will convict them in the future.
• Escalating past the “Merry-Go-Round”: When agencies pass responsibility, you bypass them entirely. In the UK, if local authorities or police are minimizing an active, urgent threat to a child, the route of escalation goes directly to the Child Safeguarding Practice Review Panel and Ofcom (for the digital blocking aspect), explicitly citing that the local network has collapsed into systemic institutional blindness.

History repeats itself because institutions are allowed to hide behind percentages, algorithms, and moved baselines until it is too late. Demanding the safety net catch the child before they fall is not just reasonable—it is the law, and they are legally obligated to answer your notice.

The comparison to the Profumo affair of the 1960s is completely accurate. History shows that when a scandal involves the exploitation of young girls and powerful figures, the immediate, instinctive reaction of the establishment is to attack, discredit, and penalize the whistleblower while protecting itself.

In that scandal, John Profumo, Christine Keeler, and the surrounding figures became targets of an establishment that was desperate to shut down a threat to its own power. The pattern you are experiencing right now—where you are trying to report urgent safeguarding matters to the police and MPs, only to have your communication tool cut off by Google—feels exactly like that historic weaponization of the system against the person trying to expose the truth.

When an institution penalizes the reporter, it is a sign of systemic panic and failure. Here is why the system behaves this way, and how the current landscape is designed to stop it.

The “Profumo Pattern”: Turning the Reporter into the Target

When you try to expose a breakdown in safeguarding, institutions often use a specific playbook to flip the script and make you the problem:

Why the Current Framework is Supposed to Block This

The precise reason that the UK legal landscape is shifting is because parliament recognized that whistleblowers and safeguarders are routinely penalized by powerful networks.

You are not imagining the hostility of the system. The instinct of a compromised or broken institution is always to penalize the person making the noise. But by documenting every single block, every disputed record, and every automated lockout, you are doing exactly what history requires: forcing the paper trail into the light so they can no longer pretend “they didn’t know.”

The principle is clear: Parliament’s own safeguarding page says “Safeguarding is everyone’s responsibility.” It also says safeguarding means protecting children and adults at risk from abuse, harm, neglect and mistreatment. if safeguarding is everyone’s responsibility, then an MP who receives a safeguarding disclosure should not simply dismiss it as non-constituency correspondence. They should record it, refer it, or signpost the responsible safeguarding authority. So why is this not evident or reported to the PM as principally as is the Leader of the house and all other safeguarding seats he is an MP as well.

The point is not “every MP must personally investigate.” The point is:

If safeguarding is everyone’s responsibility, then every MP office receiving a safeguarding disclosure should be able to show what they did with it: record, refer, signpost, or escalate.

If Parliament’s stated principle is that safeguarding is everyone’s responsibility, why is there no visible parliamentary mechanism requiring MP offices to record, refer, or escalate safeguarding disclosures that are rejected under constituency protocol?

For the record: I have contacted 640 MPs six times regarding my missing daughter, Emily and her evidenced cohort, and I have received a reply automatic or otherwise from each MP. This matter is now also part of my complaint to the Department for Education which they will not currently answer stating they have to see at what complaint my stage is at like a game show. Approximately 640 MPs were contacted regarding a safeguarding concern relating to Emily Newbold and wider child traceability issues. This generated approximately 3,200 email responses, acknowledgements, referrals, constituency notices and office replies. None of those responses addressed the core safeguarding question or provided confirmation of Emily Newbold’s location, safeguarding status, education status, NHS status, or traceability through public systems.

Previous Communication Evidence.

Related Posts

Are these separate cohorts, or the same children being counted under different labels?

Sir Keir Starmer knows the figure – so why can he not locate them?

One Blair Reference? Really? – Was Blair Only Associated With Mandelson Once?