Nicolas MOUARTIt is the best AMV #fairuse (the casino always wins, ie Google)
Princess Mononoke AMV - The Prodigy - Voodoo People
https://youtu.be/2g3mwKQQGcY
#fairuse I am not making a dime on top of this.
Tino EberlEin US-Gericht urteilt erstmals gegen ein #KI-Unternehmen wegen #Urheberrechtsverletzung – und verweigert die Berufung auf „Fair Use“.
Das #Urteil gegen Ross Intelligence könnte Signalwirkung für die gesamte KI-Branche haben.
Mehr zum Fall im Artikel.
#Urheberrecht #FairUse #ThomsonReuters #RossIntelligence #AIEthics #Rechtsprechung #KIMissbrauch #Retröt
Miguel Afonso Caetano"As the first copyright cases concerning AI reach appeals courts, EFF wants to protect important, beneficial uses of this technology—including AI for legal research. That’s why we weighed in on the long-running case of Thomson Reuters v. ROSS Intelligence. This case raises at least two important issues: the use of (possibly) copyrighted material to train a machine learning AI system, and public access to legal texts.
ROSS Intelligence was a legal research startup that built an AI-based tool for locating judges’ written opinions based on natural language queries—a competitor to ubiquitous legal research platforms like Lexis and Thomson Reuters’ Westlaw. To build its tool, ROSS hired another firm to read through thousands of the “West headnotes” that Thomson Reuters adds to the legal decisions it publishes, paraphrasing the individual legal conclusions (what lawyers call “holdings”) that the headnotes identified. ROSS used those paraphrases to train its tool. Importantly, the ROSS tool didn’t output any West headnotes, or even the paraphrases of those headnotes—it simply directed the user to the original judges’ decisions. Still, Thomson sued ROSS for copyright infringement, arguing that using the headnotes without permission was illegal.
Early decisions in the suit were encouraging. EFF wrote about how the court allowed ROSS to bring an antitrust counterclaim against Thomson Reuters, letting them try to prove that Thomson was abusing monopoly power. And the trial judge initially ruled that ROSS’s use of the West headnotes was fair use under copyright law."
https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2025/09/protecting-access-law-and-beneficial-uses-ai
Protecting Access to the Law—and Beneficial Uses of AI
As the first copyright cases concerning AI reach appeals courts, EFF wants to protect important, beneficial uses of this technology—including AI for legal research. That’s why we weighed in on the long-running case of Thomson Reuters v. ROSS Intelligence. This case raises at least two important...
"On July 31, a judge allowed Klein’s lawyers to file a subpoena with Reddit and Discord that would reveal the identities of the people running r/h3snark and an associated Discord server. On September 22, lawyers for the defendants filed a motion to quash the subpoenas.
“On its face, the Action is about copyright infringement,” the latest filing said. “At its heart, however, the Action is about stifling criticism and seeking retribution by unmasking individuals for perceived reputational harms TEI [Klein’s production company] attributes to [John Doe moderators] unrelated to TEI’s intellectual property rights.”
The defendants’ lawyers said the subpoena to unmask moderators should be quashed because Klein can’t prove his case of copyright infringement, but also because revealing such information could put the Does’ in harm’s way. “The balance of equities weighs in favor of Does’ anonymity and quashing TEI’s Subpoenas in their entirety,” the filing said."
https://www.404media.co/reddit-mods-sued-by-youtuber-ethan-klein-fight-efforts-to-unmask-them/
#USA #SocialMedia #Reddit #YouTube #ContentModeration #Copyright #FairUse
Reddit Mods Sued by YouTuber Ethan Klein Fight Efforts to Unmask Them
Klein has attempted to subpoena Discord and Reddit for information that would reveal the identity of moderators of a subreddit critical of him. The moderators' lawyers fear their clients will be physically attacked if the subpoenas go through.
EFF Updates RSSProtecting Access to the Law—and Beneficial Uses of AI
https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2025/09/protecting-access-law-and-beneficial-uses-ai
Protecting Access to the Law—and Beneficial Uses of AI
As the first copyright cases concerning AI reach appeals courts, EFF wants to protect important, beneficial uses of this technology—including AI for legal research. That’s why we weighed in on the long-running case of Thomson Reuters v. ROSS Intelligence. This case raises at least two important...
CCIACCIA, @ProgressChamber & @NetChoice have filed an amicus brief urging the Third Circuit to reverse a flawed ruling that threatens competition & U.S. leadership in AI. #FairUse enables balanced #copyright & AI innovation. Read more: https://ccianet.org/news/2025/09/ccia-files-amicus-brief-supporting-fair-use/
Analog Assassin (Re-Edit) By UR
https://youtu.be/7LcDxDri2GA
#fairuse (this one is impossible to buy) #detroittechno #technomusic
earthlingFair Use for Nonfiction Authors by Robert Kirk Walker, 2017
Common Scenarios with Guidance from Community Practice
The Authors Alliance guide to Fair Use for Nonfiction Authors is designed to empower authors to exercise their right to use source materials to further their research and writing goals by helping them to make confident fair use decisions.
