Home ━ The European Conservative [Unofficial]Finnish MP To Appeal ‘Hate Speech’ Conviction to Strasbourg
Balkan Insight [Unofficial]European Court Judgment Spotlights Turkey’s Weaponisation of Terrorism Laws
VölkerrechtsblogNew on our blog!
From Evidence to Assumption
In its judgments in Seyhan and Others, Karslı and Others and Bozyokuş and Others v. Türkiye, published on 16 December 2025, the European Court of Human Rights (the Court or ECtHR) exposed a state of structural lawlessness in Turkish criminal court proceedings. Individualized criminal liability had been replaced by an
World news | The GuardianRoman Abramovich takes Jersey to European human rights court over Chelsea sale proceeds https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/apr/22/roman-abramovich-jersey-european-human-rights-court-chelsea-sale-proceeds #RomanAbramovich #EuropeanCourtOfHumanRights #Jersey #ChannelIslands #Chelsea #Ukraine #Europe #HumanRights #Law #UkNews #WorldNews #Russia
Father’s Dying Wish: Albanian Sues Serbia in Strasbourg after Address ‘Erased’
The Mirror: News, Sport, Celebrity & Entertainment [Unofficial]Inside the Tour Guide murder and how a TikTok post solved the case
https://fed.brid.gy/r/https://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/inside-tour-guide-murder-how-36890420
New on our blog!
The Bonaire Climate Case
Climate injustices are often interlinked with other historical injustices related to colonization, slavery, and their remnants which manifest in different forms of disadvantage in the lives of present and future people. The case of Greenpeace Netherlands v The State of the Netherlands (Bonaire Case) is a reminder of this. On January 28, 2
New on our blog!
The Bonaire Climate Case
Climate injustices are often interlinked with other historical injustices related to colonization, slavery, and their remnants which manifest in different forms of disadvantage in the lives of present and future people. The case of Greenpeace Netherlands v The State of the Netherlands (Bonaire Case) is a reminder of this. On January 28, 2
New on our blog!
Redefining Family?
‘Gravity of Tenderness’ by The Fabler.
Legal traditions are formed by deeply rooted assumptions about social realities. Who legally counts as a parent and what relationships count as kin are primary examples of how law embeds those assumptions. Yet social practices have always varied, and de facto fam
#EuropeanCourtOfHumanRights #LGBTQIARights #ReproductiveRights #RightToPrivateAndFamilyLife
New on our blog!
What Makes a Lawyer a Lawyer?
What makes a lawyer a lawyer? The question sounds elementary, yet legal systems rarely confront it directly. Ordinarily, they need not to: the role is constituted through a familiar constellation of duties, privileges, and institutionalized relationships that cohere without requiring explicit theorisation.
Regvar v.
