#Prison for “internal enemies”:
"Administrative detention, long weaponized against Palestinians under occupation, is gradually being directed toward those with citizenship too."

#972Mag: https://www.972mag.com/administrative-detention-palestinian-citizens/ @israel @supremacy

#OneState #crackDown #dissent #AdministrativeDetention #Palestinians #PalestiniansLivesMatter #repression #coloniality #citizenship #israelApartheid #JewishState #JewishSupremacy #Ofer #StateRacism #BenGvir #racism #theocracy #ethnocracy #JewishState #stateViolence

#reference / Shlaim, Avi, Nadim Rouhana, Andre Zaaiman, and Na’eem Jeenah. 2012. “Pretending Democracy: Israel, an Ethnocratic State.”

The "Iron Wall" doctrine is a political strategy proposed by Zionist leader Ze'ev Jabotinsky in 1923. Knowing very well European Jewish presence in Palestine would never be accepted, It advocated for the establishment of a Jewish state as a so-called "iron wall". The doctrine argued that Zionists should prioritize building up their own military and economic power without making any concessions to Arab interests or seeking Arab cooperation.

----------

Zionism, the founding fathers and the Palestine Arabs, Avi Shlaim

[...] My central thesis in this chapter is that the iron wall was a national strategy to which rival Zionist political camps subscribed during both the pre-independence and the post-independence periods. In other words, it will be argued that there was a remarkable convergence between mainstream Labour Zionism and right-wing Revisionist Zionism when it came to the Arab question and that this convergence persisted after 1948 under the Labor Party, Likud, and Kadima. To say this is not to deny the existence of deep differences between the rival political camps. Clearly, there was always a European-style ideological divergence between the left and right wing on social, economic and political issues. Nor is it to deny that there were also significant differences when it came to the Arab question. Rather, the argument is that while left and right were divided on the territorial aims of Zionism, they were united on the strategy of the iron wall. Revisionist Zionism staked a claim to a Jewish state over the whole of the British mandate of Palestine, including Transjordan. Labour Zionists, on the other hand, accepted the principle of the partition of Palestine into two states, one Jewish and one Arab. At the risk of over-simplification, the two groups may therefore be described as territorial maximalists and territorial realists. Yet – and this is the crucial point – regardless of the extent of their territorial ambition, the two groups understood that, given the absolute Arab rejection of the whole idea, a Jewish state could be established only by force of arms.

@histodons
@bookstodon @israel
@palestine
#IsraelHamasWar
#Ethnocracy
#Palestine
#Israel