Já me adiantando: se não quiser ler críticas ao Governo Lula, faça-se o favor de deixar de me seguir para não se aborrecer.
Dito isso:
Alguém já falou o suficiente que o sítio Gov.br é uma absoluta bagunça? Outra: sabe-se que a participação de mercado do #androide no Brasil, em #espertofones, é, no mínimo, quatro vezes maior que o do #EuOs. Ainda assim, no Gov.br está lotado de aplicativos EXCLUSIVOS para o #EuFone. Sinceramente, não dá pra defender isso.
GONICUS unterstützt das @eu_os Projekt mit der automatisierten Bereitstellung über Foreman – damit IT-Infrastrukturen im öffentlichen Umfeld sicher, reproduzierbar und effizient betrieben werden können.
Ein praxisnaher Beitrag zu mehr digitaler Unabhängigkeit in Europas Verwaltungen. 👉 https://eu-os.eu/
#EUOS #GONICUS #OpenSource #DigitalSouveränität #Foreman #Automation #PublicSector
Was wäre, wenn Verwaltungen in Europa auf einer gemeinsamen, sicheren und offenen Plattform arbeiten könnten?
@eu_os ist ein Proof of Concept für genau das:
Ein gemeinsames, freies Betriebssystem für den europäischen öffentlichen Sektor. Ziel ist es, digitale Arbeitsplätze unabhängig, transparent und effizient zu gestalten – ohne proprietäre Abhängigkeiten.
GONICUS steuerte das automatisierte Deployment bei.
Mehr unter: https://eu-os.eu/
Odwrót od MS – Europa przeprasza Open Source
Pierwszy poważniejszy artykuł, tym razem nietechniczny. Będzie o cyfrowej suwerenności Europy, jej zależności od Big Techów, o zmianie kursu na Open Source i o tym jak sobie z tym radzą poszczególne kraje europejskie w tym Polska. Poruszam także temat wydarzeń, które stały się katalizatorem zmian w postrzeganiu wolnego oprogramowania przez europejskich polityków oraz korzyści i wyzwania jakie wiążą z migracją na otwartoźródłowe oprogramowanie w organach administracyjnych.
Artykuł nieco dłuższy, ale mam nadzieję, że zainteresuje wielu z Was. Zapraszam do lektury oraz oczywiście do dyskusji w wątku lub w komentarzach.
https://wolnoscwkieszeni.pl/odwrot-od-ms-europa-przeprasza-open-source/
#eu #linux #opensource #euos
While FOSS does offer a great deal of flexibility, there are still practical concerns around jurisdiction, especially when it comes to legal matters, security audits, and the involvement of major corporations. Even though the software itself is open and can be modified, the infrastructure and support around it — such as funding, legal protections, or compliance — can still be influenced by where the project is based or the entities involved. Moving to a more independent, EU-based model could help mitigate some of those risks and offer more sovereignty in the long run.
Furthermore, the concern remains that the U.S. government could potentially order a company to introduce a hidden backdoor into the software, and the corporation might not be free — or even able — to disclose this information. This is a serious issue, especially as political pressures grow. In a broader sense, the U.S. is increasingly resembling more authoritarian regimes like Russia or China when it comes to digital policies, where control over software and data is prioritized over privacy or transparency.
Even though FOSS allows you to examine the code, the reality is that no one can continuously monitor the entire system at all times. The complexities of modern operating systems make it incredibly difficult to scrutinize every line of code, especially as it evolves. This is why reducing dependency on American corporations and jurisdiction could be an essential step toward ensuring true independence and security.
Relying on America's IBM's Fedora Linux, CentOS Linux, and Red Hat Linux as upstream sources does not address many of the challenges that an independent, EU-based OS could solve.
It would be beneficial if your concept either became independent (via a hard fork), thus removing reliance on American businesses and jurisdiction, or if you developed a completely independent OS from scratch.