As I mention occasionally, I'm NOT a liberal; I'm a Neocon. In three decades of U.S. Army and Intelligence service, I never met a U.S. war I didn't like (I retired in 2013)--though there also hasn't been one I didn't have some pointed critiques for. As a military ETHICIST, I strongly believe that a professional must be able to hold both these perspectives at the same time.
I'm also a Cognitive Psychology Ph.D., and I taught Critical Thinking for the Strategic Leader at the U.S. Naval War College for a decade. I'm painfully aware that human beings are hardwired to form biases: no individual can ever perfectly check themselves (though some are obviously better at it than others, who may not even be able TO ACKNOWLEDGE THEY HAVE biases!).
With these things in mind, while I have often--OFTEN!--disagreed with the four Popes of my adult lifetime on matters of war, I have also always respected them greatly for their moral perspective. Sometimes MOST OF ALL when it challenged my own thinking. Even if I emerged with my confidence in U.S. policy intact, my argument would be stronger for having confronted it forthrightly. And perhaps I would even recognize moral weaknesses or vulnerabilities in our policy or strategy, and could reflect on ways we might mitigate them, while still achieving our objectives. This was especially critical during the Bush 43 Administration, when I had direct input at the White House level for a time: they didn't always agree with MY moral perspectives either, but they always respected me--or at least never THREATENED me for honestly presenting them!
Finally, as I've also discussed here, I'm a Believer--like the Pope, someone who tries to live his life in submission to the religion of Abraham. MY Scripture, the Qur'an, tells me that, on the Last Day, I am going to be called to account before God for EVERY life my actions caused to be taken unjustly--no matter what the (human) Law of Armed Conflict said about it at the time; no matter how unintentionally--and warns me that
"That is why We ordained for the Children of Israel that whoever takes a life—unless as a punishment for murder or mischief in the land—it will be as if they killed all of humanity; and whoever saves a life, it will be as if they saved all of humanity. ˹Although˺ Our messengers already came to them with clear proofs, many of them still transgressed afterwards through the land." (Qur'an 5:32)
To MY eye, a wise leader--anticipating that accountability--wants as much moral counsel from those trusted with that duty AS POSSIBLE, and wants to pay it careful and frank attention, so that the Judge who is watching will know the sincerity of their effort and, while admonishing them with full justice, have mercy on them for their failures.
But I suppose maybe if you're the #Donjjal, you're already pretty sure that's not gonna happen....
https://www.threads.com/@meidastouch/post/DXEtliJlNNR