Punto Informatico: Denunce ai Carabinieri con l’app IO, senza andare in caserma

Presto sarà possibile sporgere denunce tramite l'app IO senza andare in caserma: l'annuncio dal comandante generale dei Carabinieri.
The post Denunce ai Carabinieri con l’app IO, senza andare in caserma appeared first on Punto Informatico.

Garlasco – “I don’t make deals and I will speak again,” insists Massimo Lovati, the former lawyer for Sempio, on the “machination” of 2017.

“Part of the 2017 investigation was dumped into today’s proceedings, so there’s a certain continuity, they could be interdependent.” With these words, Massimo Lovati, former lawyer for Andrea Sempio, reiterated the claim of a supposed “conspiracy” behind the investigation that nine years earlier involved the 38-year-old in the Garlasco crime. Lovati spoke this morning upon entering the Milan Courthouse, where the pre-trial hearing of the case against him for defamation was held. The accusation stems from statements made on March 13, 2025, outside the Montebello Barracks in Milan, when he described the 2017 investigation into Sempio as “the result of a conspiracy orchestrated by the defense of the Giarda Studio.”

Accompanied by his lawyer, Fabrizio Gallo, the 73-year-old from Vigevano denied the possibility of alternative proceedings. “I don’t plea bargain, I don’t ask for a suspended sentence,” he stated, explaining that nothing would happen “nothing” during today’s hearing. However, another point drew attention: Lovati announced that “later” he might make further statements about the case that led to his trial. “I will speak about the 2017 conspiracy, that’s why I am here,” he told the reporters.

Lovati was investigated and subsequently indicted by the Milan Public Prosecutor Fabio De Pasquale following a complaint filed by the lawyers Enrico and Fabio Giarda, children of Professor Angelo Giarda, the historic lawyer for Alberto Stasi, who was definitively convicted for the murder of Chiara Poggi.

The indictment charges Lovati not only with the statements made outside the Command Legion Carabinieri Lombardia barracks, where Sempio had gone for DNA collection after the reopening of the investigation, but also with a long series of statements made to national television and broadcasts. According to the prosecution, Lovati allegedly told viewers of Tg1, Tg2, Tg3, SkyTG24, La7, Mediaset, Milano Pavia Tv, Fanpage, Antenna 3 and programs like Quarto Grado, Le Iene and Mattino Cinque that “the 2017 investigation” was “the result of a manipulation organized by the investigators of the defense studios of Stasi,” adding that Sempio’s DNA had been “clandestinely taken” in 2016.

Lovati’s statements come as the Garlasco case continues to reignite the debate between the defense teams involved in the new investigative phase. In an interview with Repubblica, Antonio De Rensis, defender of Alberto Stasi alongside lawyer Giada Boccellari, reiterated that the defense’s work will continue without hesitation. “No judicial action can slow me and my colleague Boccellari in trying to establish what we consider to be the truth: Alberto Stasi is innocent. Especially after reading the documents from Pavia,” the lawyer stated.

According to De Rensis, the new evidence in the investigation “further distances Alberto from the responsibilities established by the verdicts” and represents “an enormous, deeper and more complex job than I could have imagined.” The lawyer then harshly criticized certain reconstructions that emerged in the media debate surrounding the case. “I am dismayed to read and hear an investigated making suppositions of corruption about Napoleone and Civardi. And even more so certain of your colleagues giving the poor imbecile carabinieri. I believe it is more than legitimate to doubt these media,” he declared, adding: “From the moment I worked alongside Giada Boccellari, I imagined this would happen.” Finally, De Rensis commented on the complaint filed against him by Stefania Cappa, Chiara Poggi’s cousin. “I keep to myself what I think. Certainly, when she made her report public, I defended myself on TV with Milo Infante: I believe I have the right to do so,” he concluded.

The article Garlasco – “I don’t plea bargain and I will speak again” the ex-lawyer of Sempio, Massimo Lovati, insists on the “conspiracy” of 2017 originates from Il Fatto Quotidiano.

#MassimoLovati #Sempio #AndreaSempio #Garlasco #Lovati #theMilanCourthouse #Milan #theGiardaStudio #FabrizioGallo #Vigevano #FabioDePasquale #Enrico #FabioGiarda #AngeloGiarda #AlbertoStasi #ChiaraPoggi #Mediaset #MilanoPaviaTv #Fanpage #Antenna3 #QuartoGrado #LeIene #MattinoCinque #Stasi #Repubblica #AntonioDeRensis #GiadaBoccellari #Boccellari #Pavia #DeRensis #Alberto #Napoleone #Civardi #StefaniaCappa #ChiaraPoggi’s #MiloInfante #IlFattoQuotidiano

https://www.ilfattoquotidiano.it/2026/05/26/non-patteggio-e-parlero-ancora-lex-avvocato-di-sempio-massimo-lovati-insiste-sulla-macchinazione-del-2017/8398994/

Garlasco – “Non patteggio e parlerò ancora” l’ex avvocato di Sempio, Massimo Lovati, insiste…

L'ex difensore a processo per diffamazione dopo le accuse allo studio legale Giarda. Intanto De Rensis: “Nulla fermerà la ricerca della verità su Stasi”

Il Fatto Quotidiano

Il Tempo: Garlasco, bordata di Milo Infante: "Quanto siamo caduti in basso". Con chi ce l'ha

Nel giorno in cui si inizia a parlare concretamente di una possibile richiesta di revisione del processo ad Alberto Stasi, Milo Infante dedica la puntata di Ore 14 Sera al caso di Garlasco. Si parte da uno degli elementi alla base della condanna del fidanzato di Chiara Poggi, la famosa telefonata al 118. "Lei ha fatto benissimo a riproporla perché da lì nasce tutto", afferma Antonio De Rensis, avvocato di Stasi secondo cui le vicende del suo assistito derivano tutte da lì: "Tutto nasce da quella telefonata.Passando per un fermo che non aveva alcun motivo di esistere, passando per uno scambio di pedali mai avvenuto e potrei andare avanti. E quindi è giusto che quella telefonata rappresenti un punto di partenza che non ha alcuna valenza probatoria".

L'avvocato è al centro anche di un altro caso, l'esposto presentato da una giornalista che sostiene che il legale "orienta indagini e tv". "C'è un'operazione realtà, e un'operazione spazzatura. Ma è una giornata bellissima", commenta De Rensis in trasmissione che racconta di essere stato registrato durante una cena in un noto ristorante di Milano il 22 gennaio scorso: .Perché se ho detto cose tanto gravi non ha parlato ma lo ha fatto solo ora?", chiede retoricamente il legale. 

"Non è un po' strano che nei giorni in cui Napoleone chiede la revisione sostanzialmente del processo di Stasi, escano audio" che ipotizzano "manipolazioni e condizionamenti?", chiede Infante che non risparmia un commento duro sulla vicenda: "Quanto siamo caduti in basso?".

Garlasco, embroidered by Milo Infante: "How far we have fallen". Who did this to us?

On the day that concrete discussion about a possible request for a review of the process began with Alberto Stasi, Milo Infante dedicates the episode of Ore 14 Sera to the Garlasco case. It starts with one of the elements at the base of the boyfriend of Chiara Poggi’s conviction, the famous phone call to the 118. “She did well to re-propose it because that’s where everything started,” says Antonio De Rensis, Stasi’s lawyer, who claims that his client’s affairs all stem from there: “Everything started from that phone call. Passing through a detention that had no reason to exist, passing through a wheeling and dealing that never happened, and I could go on. And therefore it is right that that phone call represents a starting point that has no evidentiary value.”

The lawyer is at the center of another case as well, the complaint filed by a journalist who claims that the legal representative “directs investigations and TV.” “There’s a real operation, and a trash operation. But it’s a beautiful day,” De Rensis comments in the broadcast that recounts being recorded during a dinner at a well-known Milan restaurant on January 22nd: “Why if I said so much, she didn’t speak but only now?” the lawyer asks rhetorically.

“Isn’t it strange that on the days when Napoleon asks for the substantial review of Stasi’s trial, audio recordings come out” that hypothesize “manipulations and conditioning?” Infante asks, who doesn’t spare a harsh comment about the affair: “How far have we fallen?”

#Garlasco #MiloInfante #AlbertoStasi #ChiaraPoggi’s #AntonioDeRensis #Stasi #DeRensis #Milan #Napoleon #Infante

https://www.iltempo.it/personaggi/2026/04/24/news/ore-14-sera-garlasco-milo-infante-quanto-siamo-caduti-in-basso-de-rensis-audio-47424659/

Garlasco, bordata di Milo Infante: "Quanto siamo caduti in basso". Con chi ce l'ha

Nel giorno in cui si inizia a parlare concretamente di una possibile richiesta di revisione del processo ad Alberto Stasi, Milo Infante dedica la punt...