Æ har begått blogg.
Refleksjona fra et liv som deltaker i et mangfold av gruppa og organisasjona.
Korsn gjenkjenn maktsentraliseranes mekanisma, og argumenta om koffør din organisasjon bør arbeid bevisst førr å desentralisere makta internt.
https://write.data.coop/papiris/argumenter-for-desentralisering
#norskTut #allheimen #organisasjon #desentralisering #sentralisering #anarkisme #makt #maktstruktur #federation #decentralisation #anarchism
Self-custody has a hidden dependency.
If you are not running your own Bitcoin node, your wallet is still trusting someone else’s infrastructure.
Most wallets query external servers for balances and transactions. That means you are not verifying Bitcoin yourself, and you are leaking metadata about your activity.
Running a node changes that.
You independently verify the blockchain, enforce the rules, and keep your data local. It also unlocks a full self-hosted stack, from Lightning to private wallet backends.
Read link below.
https://www.solosatoshi.com/bitcoin-node-benefits-requirements-setup/
Is self-custody complete if you still depend on someone else’s node?
#Bitcoin #SelfCustody #Privacy #Linux #SelfHosting #Decentralisation
Bitcoin Lightning just took a big step towards mainstream use.
Square has enabled Lightning payments for around 4 million merchants, allowing instant, low-fee Bitcoin transactions through existing point-of-sale systems.
At the same time, Lightning is already processing over $1 billion in monthly volume, showing real-world demand for fast, low-cost payments.
This looks like adoption, but there’s a deeper layer.
If most payments are auto-converted to fiat, then users are not really interacting with Bitcoin as sovereign money.
That makes self-custody and self-hosting even more important.
Read links below.
https://www.binance.com/en/square/post/307298888835250
https://ourcryptotalk.com/news/square-activates-bitcoin-lightning-payments-for-4m-merchants-today
If Bitcoin becomes a background payment rail, will you still choose to control your own keys?
Something new is coming to https://beitmenotyou.online
Every Sunday, I'll be publishing Control+Alt+Autonomy, a weekly newsletter covering privacy, digital rights, Linux, self-hosting, decentralisation, self-custody, freedom of speech, and the wider fight to take back control of your digital life.
Each issue will bring together fresh stories, blog posts, YouTube videos, podcasts, and social posts from the last 7 days, all shaped into something clear, useful, and easy to read.
The first edition lands this Sunday.
#ControlAltAutonomy #Newsletter #Privacy #DigitalRights #Linux #SelfHosting #Decentralisation #SelfCustody #Freedom #Cypherpunk
This week's Surveillance Report is a brutal reminder of where tech is heading.
Two iOS exploit frameworks prompted Apple to issue urgent updates. Google is tightening sideloading. Instagram is ending end-to-end encrypted DMs. Colorado is pushing age signals into the OS. Proton is another reminder that privacy tools still live inside legal systems. Meta also had an internal AI scare.
This is not one story. It is a pattern: more surveillance, more gatekeeping, more friction for ordinary users, all sold as safety.
If you use an iPhone, check Settings > General > Software Update.
Watch:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qllpVoCVQSE
Are we getting safer, or just easier to monitor?
#Privacy #DigitalRights #CyberSecurity #Encryption #Decentralisation
Altcoin ETFs may bring fresh liquidity into Crypto, but there's a deeper question here.
What happens when active, living networks get turned into passive Wall Street products?
Price exposure is not the same as participation. If money flows in through ETFs, but users do not hold the asset directly or stay close to the network itself, Crypto risks becoming something people speculate on rather than something they help secure, shape, and use.
Liquidity can help. Adoption can help. But convenience can also centralise power.
Watch: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L6c-HtBf7EE
Are altcoin ETFs opening the door to adoption, or building a governance trap in plain sight?
#AltcoinETF #Crypto #DeFi #Governance #SelfCustody #Decentralisation #Web3
Privacy in crypto is shifting from optional to essential.
Non-custodial, no-KYC platforms are seeing rapid growth, with swap volumes up over 340% year-on-year as users move away from intermediaries and towards self-custody.
At the same time: • Policy still lacks clear financial privacy protections
• US regulators are beginning to acknowledge legitimate uses for privacy tools
The pattern is simple. More control at the edges, more pressure in the middle.
That makes self-hosting, Linux, and running your own stack more relevant than ever.
Read links below.
https://cryptonews.com/press-releases/privacy-first-crypto-trading-is-surging-in-2026-why-no-kyc-exchanges-are-gaining-ground/
https://www.coindesk.com/opinion/2026/03/31/the-time-for-clear-financial-privacy-rules-is-now
As privacy becomes a core feature, will more people move to self-custody or stick with convenience?
Je vous parle souvent de Delta Chat ( aka @delta ) outil de chat sécurisé et réellement décentralisé.
La dernière version apporte une nouveauté majeur à la limite de la sorcellerie :
Désormais on peut choisir plusieurs relay, et si un relay est inaccessible, un autre peut distribuer le message.
La décentralisation level Super Saiyan.
lire https://delta.chat/en/2026-03-31-zero
#Chat
#DeltaChat
#OpenSource
#Décentralisation
#DecentralizeEverything
#ZeroMetadata
US crypto law is starting to make an important distinction: intermediaries are not the same thing as self-custodial tools.
Reuters reports that the CLARITY Act would set a clearer federal market structure for digital assets, including a path for some networks to be treated as commodities once they are sufficiently decentralised. Reuters Practical Law also says the GENIUS Act includes peer-to-peer safe harbours and excludes distributed ledger protocols and self-custodial software interfaces from the DASP definition.
That does not solve everything, but it suggests lawmakers are slowly being forced to admit that open protocols and self-custody are not the same as custodial platforms.
Read links below.
https://www.reuters.com/legal/legalindustry/clarity-act-future-digital-asset-market--pracin-2026-03-31/
Will clearer regulation strengthen self-sovereignty, or make decentralisation easier to contain?
#Bitcoin #SelfCustody #Decentralisation #Privacy #DigitalRights
Bitcoin Lightning is quietly moving into everyday payments.
Square has begun enabling Lightning payments for millions of merchants by default. No extra setup, just built in.
At the same time, tools like Boltz are enabling non-custodial swaps between Lightning and stablecoins without accounts or KYC.
So we now have two paths: • seamless mainstream adoption
• self-sovereign, privacy-first usage
Both are growing, but they don’t always align.
That’s the tension to watch. Convenience can easily come at the cost of control.
Read links below.
https://u.today/bitcoin-lighting-gets-major-adoption-boost-in-us
https://news.bitcoin.com/boltz-launches-non-custodial-usdt-swaps-connecting-lightning-to-stablecoins/
As Lightning becomes invisible in apps and payment systems, will people still choose sovereignty over convenience?
papiris gjør antifascisme🌠
Michael J. Burgess
matiu bidule