Australia
RE: https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:5xbcanckrog4b45mimbmbxkx/post/3mow3hmbzoc2k

CLIMATE LITIGATION TRENDS: Legal Pathways for Emission Accountability & Corporate Liability #AIEvidentialMaterial #Perplexity Llewelyn Pritchard
Young Americans are suing the president for violating rights with executive orders that fuel the climate crisis
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/ng-interactive/2026/may/20/eva-lighthiser-trump-climate
UN General Assembly backs ICJ Climate ruling, saying States have an obligation to tackle climate change.
Guess who voted against?
https://news.un.org/en/story/2026/05/1167561
#UN #Climate #Law #ClimateLaw #ICJ #InternationalLaw #USPol #Geopolitics
Thanks for socializing this. Yeah, looking at the bill, I see its first purpose is:
«(1) to develop, and increase the efficiency of, all energy sources to meet the needs of present and future generations»
Yes, the bill does have the gall to say they're doing this for future generations. There will be nothing efficient about energy sources that make the planet so hot that life struggles to survive. Surviving that way will NOT be efficient.
Also from the bill:
«(4) GREENHOUSE GAS.—The term ‘‘greenhouse gas’’ means a gas released into the atmosphere that traps heat, including carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide.»
So, in a kind of diabolical irony, though they use the term alleged a lot to make all the things they might get sued over seem contrived, they don't use it here in this passage. That's probably so that any new research newly showing any gas actually does "trap heat" (what causes the planet to warm) will then empower this law to say "oh, then you can't sue over THAT". They know that precisely the gases that heat the planet ARE going to be a problem for them in the courts, because they are being willfully sloppy.
Note, too, the severability clause at the end of this, which anticipates that courts will find a lot of this nonsense and hopes that fragments can stay intact in spite of that.
The article references this document. If it was introduced into Congress, I bet there is a different reference that's better.
The draft bill I was looking at, which I think is not the text of record for Congress, is: https://www.cruz.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/stop_climate_shakedowns_act_of_2026.pdf
I note, by the way, that Cruz's press release says "The Stop Climate Shakedowns Act prohibits frivolous climate lawsuits against American energy producers from being brought in either state or federal court." That's not true. In fact, it DEFINES all lawsuits related to climate to be frivolous. That is far more broad. It does not create criteria for identifying what's frivolous from among ones that might not. It says all climate lawsuits are by their nature frivolous.
Here's the press release: https://www.cruz.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/sens-cruz-cotton-budd-lee-introduce-bill-to-combat-climate-lawfare-and-defend-american-energy
#climate #ClimateLaw #ClimateLawsuit #law #lawsuit #legal #collapse #extinction #RegulatoryCapture #ClimateCrisis #ClimateEmergency
No right to early combustion engine phase-out, says German court, in NGO case against BMW and Mercedes
“private individuals cannot demand that motor vehicle manufacturers cease to place on the market passenger cars with combustion engines before the deadline set by the EU Regulation setting CO2 emission standards for passenger cars.”
https://www.bundesgerichtshof.de/SharedDocs/Pressemitteilungen/DE/2026_en/2026054.html
#Climate #Law #ClimateLaw #Germany #Deutschland #Recht #Cars #EV #ICE #EU
EU climate law voted through European Parliament:
- a 2040 net emissions reduction target of 90% for the EU, compared to 1990
- From 2036, five percentage points of emissions reductions can come via international carbon credits
Member States now need to rubber stamp it (they’ve agreed in principle)