I find the obsession with Global Mean XYZ meaningless. Societally irrelevant.

GMT was necessary when change wasn't as obvious, ie in the 1980s or 1990s.
Today, regional impact stats and collapse thresholds are societally relevant. Both, to inform policy and to inform the public.
1.5°C stays relevant as enshrined binding international law. And maybe for climate litigation; all countries' governments in Paris accepted damages from up to 1.5°C.

I imagine a parallel world where climate scientists KNOW that #ClimateChange is an accepted fact, and Copernicus doesn't title a "Warmest year on record", trapped in the forever-loop of trying to convince climate trolls.

But instead, Copernicus has the intellectual free space for societally relevant scoops: "Year where C-C shatters the most livelihoods in South America" or
"Year of largest harvest loss in both, East Europe and South Asia".

#RCPcollapse #GlobalMean #Globalwarming #ClimateCommunication #SciCom

PhD position Social cohesion and climate polarization: how to communicate effectively about climate change - Rijksuniversiteit Groningen

Rijksuniversiteit Groningen

America's First Climate Change Refugees (Global Documentary)

https://peertube.gravitywell.xyz/w/nNNHmNbCMHj7UKdH5mW9nK

America's First Climate Change Refugees (Global Documentary)

PeerTube
Extreme weather isn’t just damage — it fuels climate awareness 🌪🔥 A new paper says putting “real communities” affected by floods, storms and fires at the center of climate messaging can boost support for policies and broaden coalitions for action. 🌍📣 #ClimateCommunication

Climate Messages Should Spotli...
Extreme weather isn’t just damage — it fuels climate awareness 🌪🔥 A new paper says putting “real communities” affected by floods, storms and fires at the center of climate messaging can boost support for policies and broaden coalitions for action. 🌍📣 #ClimateCommunication
https://www.theenergymix.com/climate-messages-should-spotlight-real-communities-after-extreme-weather-researchers-say/
Climate communication isn’t just about facts. Trust depends on clarity, sincerity, and shared values. People often trust “people like me” more than institutions—ignoring this weakens climate action and fuels misinformation.
#ClimateCommunication #Trust
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959378025001335
We analysed 73,000 articles and found the UK media is divorcing ‘climate change’ from net zero | The-14

Analysis of 73,000 UK news articles shows climate change is increasingly separated from net zero, shaping public confusion and fuelling response scepticism. UK.

The-14 Pictures
Australian Politicians and Climate Problem

YouTube

A lost playthrough of Daybreak is brutal.

Frustrating. Maybe because the defeat feels epistemically charged: as if climate futures themselves were lost.

I’m currently working with a colleague on this game in a chapter for an upcoming edited volume on humans, machines & climate crisis. We analyse how knowledge, imaginaries and epistemics are translated into playable mechanics — and what performing the game does to futuring.

Curious: has anyone here played Daybreak / e-Mission?
What did you notice?

#ScienceCommunication #ClimateCommunication #ScienceAndTechnologyStudies #TechniquesOfFuturing #EpistemologyOfGames #BoardGames #DaybreakGame

Can GenAI reduce climate skepticism? Two studies show small but inconsistent shifts in sceptics’ views after chatting with ChatGPT. Longer conversations didn’t boost impact, and effects may fade over time. #ClimateCommunication #GenAI #ClimateScepticism
🔗 https://www.nature.com/articles/s41558-025-02425-8?utm_source=mastodon&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=fedica-Autoposting
The promise and limitations of using GenAI to reduce climate scepticism - Nature Climate Change

ChatGPT provides a way of teaching people about climate change. This research reveals that conversations between climate sceptics and ChatGPT reduced climate scepticism, but these effects are modest, inconsistent across studies and prone to decay over time.

Nature