qwant news | One acre, one vote: The bizarre election that could decide Arizona’s energy fate
The Salt River Project (SRP), Arizona’s largest public‑power utility serving more than two million customers, is still governed by an antiquated, acreage‑based voting system that gives each landowner a vote proportional to the size of their property. Homeowners with large parcels control multiple votes, while renters and many condo owners have little or no say, leaving thousands of ratepayers excluded from decisions about how electricity is generated. This “effectively feudal” structure has kept SRP’s board resistant to clean‑energy transition, even though the utility relied on fossil fuels for roughly two‑thirds of its 2024 generation and its current carbon‑reduction plan could actually increase fossil‑fuel use by 2035.
The upcoming SRP board election, scheduled for next Tuesday, is being framed as a referendum on the utility’s energy future. A coalition of clean‑energy advocates—backed by groups such as Lead Locally—has already secured six of the 14 board seats and hopes to win a majority, while a pro‑business slate supported by large landowners and the conservative organization Turning Point USA argues for expanding natural‑gas capacity and converting retiring coal units. The clean‑energy side seeks to accelerate solar, wind and battery‑storage projects, improve energy‑efficiency programs, and rely on existing gas plants only as a short‑term bridge, whereas their opponents warn that rejecting fossil fuel upgrades will cause price spikes and reliability problems as demand surges from data‑centers, electric‑vehicle adoption, and Phoenix’s continued sprawl.
If the clean‑energy coalition captures the remaining seats—including the presidency and vice‑presidency—it could steer SRP toward meeting its projected 4 percent‑per‑year peak‑demand growth through renewable resources, aiming for roughly 45 percent clean generation within a decade. The race is unusually high‑stakes: Turning Point has mobilized hundreds of volunteers and a $500,000 pro‑business finance effort, outspending the advocates roughly ten‑to‑one. Voter turnout has historically been low—often under 10 percent—so the outcome will hinge on mobilizing the small pool of land‑owners who retain voting power and on convincing the broader ratepayer base of the benefits of a clean‑energy transition for Arizona’s future grid reliability and affordability.
Read more: https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2026/04/arizona-salt-river-project-board-elections-turning-point-usa/
#saltriverproject #turningpointusa #phoenix #cleanenergy #fossilfuels
.ECO domain
The-14
TheBadPlace
Tycoon World
Not Rappaport
Frehi
Dining and Cooking
Joe Wynne 🌻🚗⛰️
Tina M Casey
Tina M Casey