“Do not fold, spindle, or mutilate”*…

Punched cards have a long history in machine control (dating back to Jacquard) and computing (starting with Babbage‘s Difference Engine), but it was Herman Hollerith who brought them into modern computation in the late 1880s… where punch cards remained for about 100 years. From the Smithsonian’s American History Museum

In the late 1880s, American engineer Herman Hollerith saw a railroad punch card when he was trying to figure out new ways of compiling statistical information for the U.S. Census. His first punch card, like those used on railways, only had holes along the edges. The meaning of each hole was indicated on the card. By the time Hollerith tabulating equipment was used in the 1890 U.S. Census, holes were scattered across the cards, although their meaning was not indicated on it.

Hollerith and his employees at the Tabulating Machine Company in Washington, D.C. soon developed punched cards for use in compiling information for commercial enterprises such as railroads. They and staff of the U.S. Census Bureau prepared improved machines—these devices are shown in the object group on tabulating equipment. By the 1920s, the United States had two major manufacturers of punch card equipment, International Business Machines (the descendent of the Tabulating Machine Company) and Remington Rand (the descendent of Powers Accounting Machine Company established by Russian emigré and former Census Bureau employee James Powers). Each manufacturer developed a distinctive standard punch card. IBM cards had eighty columns of rectangular holes while those of Remington Rand had ninety columns of circular holes. Tabulating machines were widely used in both government and commerce, with cards designed to meet the needs of customers. For example, checks issued by the U.S. government often came on punch cards.

When IBM and Remington Rand began selling electronic computers in the years following World War II, punch cards became the preferred method of entering data and programs onto them. They also were used in later minicomputers and some early desktop calculators. Punch cards surviving in the Smithsonian collections reflect the widespread use of computers – they announced scores on standardized tests, served as a library cards, were part of the proof of mathematical theorems, and kept medical records. Some are printed with the names of users, from university computer centers and computer clubs to the Library of Congress to Bell Laboratories…

Browse the collection: “Punch Cards for Data Processing

See also: here, here, and here.

* Ubiquitous warning on punch cards:

… in the 1950s, after the invention of the computer and its widespread business use, that everyone began to see punch cards. Companies sent punch cards out with bills: the telephone company, utility companies, and even department stores realized that they could save a step in their billing process, as well as making it easier for them to process the returned check, by using the cards themselves as the bills. By the 1960s, punch cards were familiar, everyday objects.

While company employees could be trusted to take care of the cards, the person in the street could not. Warnings were necessary. In the 1930s the University of Iowa used cards for student registration; on each card was printed “Do not fold or bend this card.” Cards reproduced in an IBM sales brochure of the 1930s read “Do not fold, tear, or mutilate this card” and “Do not fold tear or destroy.” I’m not sure when the canonical “Do not fold, spindle, or mutilate” first appeared; it’s one of those traditions whose author and origin is lost in the mists of time. Let’s consider the words one at a time, stop and take them seriously…

– “A Cultural History of the Punch Card” (from 1991; eminently worth reading in full)

###

As we contemplate chads (of which, punch cards produced a gracious plenty), we might spare a thought for Gerald Hawkins; he died on this date in 2003. An astronomer and author, he was best known for his work in archaeoastronomy— most of all, for his 1965 book, Stonehenge Decoded. In the early 1960s, Hawkins had used punch cards to load data modeling sun and moon movements onto magnetic tapes, then into an IBM 7090. The results led him to conclude, as the book argues, that the features at the monument were arranged in such a way as to predict a variety of astronomical events– that Stonehenge was a giant prehistoric observatory and computer. While some archaeologists are hesitant to accept Hawkins’ theories, many archaeoastronomers have built upon his work. More widely, scholars accept that the importance of astronomical alignment and large complexes being planned and constructed to fulfill cosmology has been demonstrated at other prehistoric sites, such as the Snake Mound and Cahokia in the U.S.

source

#archaeoastronomy #astronomy #Babbage #Census #CharlesBabbage #computing #culture #data #GeraldHawkins #HermanHollerith #history #historyOfComputing #Hollerith #input #Jacquard #punchCard #punchCards #Stonehenge #storage #Technology

Quem inventou o computador? Conheça a história de criação dos primeiros PCs

https://fed.brid.gy/r/https://tecnoblog.net/responde/quem-inventou-o-computador/

🫟 𝑪𝒖𝒓𝒊𝒐𝒔𝒊𝒅𝒂𝒅𝒆𝒔 🫟

En el Londres victoriano, entre humo, hierro y ruido de fábricas, hubo alguien mirando más allá de todo eso.
Charles Babbage no veía números: veía errores.
Veía cálculos hechos a mano llenos de fallos, lentos, imprecisos… y pensaba que tenía que haber otra forma.

Y la imaginó.

No una simple calculadora, sino algo mucho más ambicioso: una máquina capaz de hacer operaciones sola, seguir instrucciones, guardar información y ejecutar procesos paso a paso.
La llamó Máquina Analítica.

Dicho así suena normal, pero no lo era en absoluto.
Estamos hablando de engranajes, ruedas dentadas y tarjetas perforadas funcionando como lo haría, un siglo después, un ordenador.
Tenía memoria, tenía una “unidad de cálculo” y hasta algo parecido a un sistema de control.

El problema no fue la idea.
Fue el momento.

El gobierno británico empezó apoyándolo, pero aquello crecía, se complicaba, costaba dinero… y dejaron de verlo claro.
Cortaron la financiación.
Y la máquina se quedó en planos, piezas sueltas y una visión que nadie terminaba de entender.

Nunca llegó a construirse.

Y ahí es donde entra otra figura clave.

Ada Lovelace.

Hija de Lord Byron, criada entre ciencia y sensibilidad, tenía una forma distinta de mirar las cosas.
Cuando estudió el trabajo de Babbage, no vio solo una máquina rara llena de engranajes.

Vio algo completamente nuevo.

Entendió que esa máquina no estaba limitada a hacer cuentas.
Que podía trabajar con símbolos, con patrones, con instrucciones encadenadas.
En otras palabras: que podía hacer mucho más que matemáticas.

Podía seguir un lenguaje.

En sus notas —que acabaron siendo más extensas que el propio trabajo de Babbage— dejó escrito lo que hoy consideramos el primer programa informático de la historia.
Un algoritmo pensado para ser ejecutado por una máquina que ni siquiera existía todavía.

Eso es lo fuerte.

Estaba describiendo el futuro sin tener forma de verlo.

Pero, igual que pasó con Babbage, el mundo no acompañó.
Faltaban medios, faltaba comprensión… y faltaba creer en algo que sonaba demasiado extraño para la época.

Se conocieron en 1833, cuando Ada tenía solo 17 años.
Babbage quedó impresionado por su inteligencia y la llamó la "Encantadora de Números".

Ada murió joven, con 36 años.
Babbage siguió trabajando hasta el final, rodeado de piezas y de una idea que casi nadie entendía del todo.

Y el tiempo pasó.

Décadas después aparecerían nombres como Alan Turing o John von Neumann, que sí conseguirían dar forma real a ese concepto. Pero no partían de cero.

La chispa ya estaba encendida.

Mucho antes.

Hoy, en museos de Londres, se conservan fragmentos de aquella Máquina Analítica: engranajes, mecanismos, tarjetas perforadas… restos físicos de una idea que llegó demasiado pronto.

Y eso es lo que deja pensando.

Porque no fue falta de inteligencia.
Ni de creatividad.

Fue falta de contexto.

A veces, la historia no avanza cuando aparece una gran idea.
Avanza cuando el mundo está preparado para entenderla.

Y en este caso, dos personas ya habían visto el futuro…
solo que lo vieron demasiado pronto.

La máquina original completa no se puede ver… porque nunca llegó a existir.
Se quedó en planos, ideas y algunas piezas sueltas.
En el Science Museum (Londres) se conservan fragmentos auténticos: engranajes, mecanismos y partes incompletas que Babbage sí llegó a fabricar.
No es la máquina completa, pero son literalmente restos del proyecto original.

▣▣▣▣▣▣▣▣▣▣▣▣▣▣▣▣▣▣

#historia #adalovelace #charlesbabbage #historiadelatecnologia #computacion #sigloxix #mujeresenlahistoria #curiosidades #algoritmos

A Brief History of Artificial Intelligence

Like any complex technology, Artificial Intelligence has its roots in a number of fields. From philosophy to computer science, mathematics to linguistics, tracing the history of AI and automation is a difficult business. The field was officially named in the 1950s, but ideas about automated machines have existed since long before then. This is a history of the development of Artificial Intelligence from some of its earliest philosophical and theoretical inceptions through to modern day […]

https://leonfurze.com/2023/02/11/a-brief-history-of-artificial-intelligence/

On 7 Mar 2019: #QueenElizabethII of Great Britain shares her first Instagram post, a letter between mathematician #CharlesBabbage and Prince Albert.

Happy birthday, Charles Babbage (b. 12/26/1791)!

Let us hope that, wherever he may be, he is finally free of organ grinders.

#UnofficialDiaryDates #CharlesBabbage

"Pray do not corrupt the cats with poetry" (Ada Lovelace to George Eliot in The Thrilling Adventures of Lovelace and Babbage).

In her riotous, rigorously researched #GraphicNovel, Sydney Padua invents an alternate universe where, instead of dying young, #AdaLovelace teams up with #CharlesBabbage to build a monumental #steampunk calculating engine. Padua's zany drawings are a delight, as is her zest for scholarly (and cheeky) footnotes!
#Books #bookstodon #amreading

https://literaryreview.co.uk/get-with-the-program

Miranda Seymour - Get with the Program

Miranda Seymour: Get with the Program - The Thrilling Adventures of Lovelace and Babbage by Sydney Padua

Literary Review