Parliament Audit2d ago

Reference re Secession of Quebec — The Supreme Court Ruling Every Province Has to Reckon With.

https://parliamentaudit.ca/news/reference-re-secession-of-quebec-the-supreme-court-ruling-every-province-has-to-reckon-with

#cdnpoli #cdnmedia

Reference re Secession of Quebec — The Supreme Court Ruling Every Province Has to Reckon With.

Reference re Secession of Quebec, [1998] 2 SCR 217, was the Supreme Court of Canada's answer to three questions the federal government referred to it after the close 1995 Quebec sovereignty referendum: Can Quebec unilaterally secede under Canadian constitutional law? Can it unilaterally secede under international law? Which prevails if they conflict? The Court's answer to the first question — and to the broader constitutional architecture of secession — became the binding legal framework that governs every Canadian secession question since. This article walks what the ruling actually says, the four principles it identified, the duty-to-negotiate doctrine, and why it applies to Alberta's 2026 independence question as fully as it applied to Quebec.

Parliament Audit2d ago

Canada's New Streaming Tax Will Cost Households Roughly $40 a Year, Per Service. The Last Time Ottawa Protected Canadian Companies This Way, We Got the World's Highest Cell Phone Bills.

https://parliamentaudit.ca/news/streaming-tax-40-per-service-wireless-protectionism-parallel

#cdnpoli #cdnmedia

Canada's New Streaming Tax Will Cost Households Roughly $40 a Year, Per Service. The Last Time Ottawa Protected Canadian Companies This Way, We Got the World's Highest Cell Phone Bills.

On May 21, 2026, the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) finalized a decision tripling the mandatory contribution rate that foreign streaming services with $25 million or more in Canadian revenue must pay to Canadian-content production funds — from a 5% interim rate (set in 2024 and under court challenge) to 15%. Industry analysts estimate the pass-through cost to consumers at $1.50 to $4.00 per service per month — roughly $18 to $48 per service per year. A typical Canadian household subscribed to Netflix Premium, Disney+, Crave, and Amazon Prime Video would see an annual increase on the order of $78. The federal government has publicly acknowledged the cost is likely to fall on Canadians and has directed the CRTC to revisit the decision. The Canadian wireless industry is the most-cited domestic precedent for what happens when foreign competition is structurally excluded from a Canadian market. The Telecommunications Act and Radiocommunication Act impose ownership restrictions (the "80/80 rule": at least 80% of voting shares and at least 80% of board members must be Canadian) that, combined with a 10% market-share trigger, effectively prevent large U.S. carriers from acquiring or fully entering Canada's wireless market. The result is documented across multiple independent studies: Canada's "Big Three" carriers (Bell, Rogers, Telus) charge prices that international comparisons regularly place among the highest in the developed world. This article walks the streaming-cost analysis, the statutory wireless-protection architecture, the Verizon 2013 attempt that was effectively dissuaded by the policy environment, expert commentary from former Competition Bureau leadership, the federal government's own admission on streaming-cost passthrough, and the honest qualifiers — including that Canadian wireless prices have come down materially since 2018 and that the streaming and wireless cases are not perfectly identical.

Parliament Audit3d ago

Mark Carney Spent $524,815 of Public Money on In-Flight Refreshments in His First Year as PM. The Average Canadian Family Spends $16,297 a Year on Food.

https://parliamentaudit.ca/news/carney-flight-catering-524000-canadian-family-food-budget

#cdnpoli #cdnmedia

Mark Carney Spent $524,815 of Public Money on In-Flight Refreshments in His First Year as PM. The Average Canadian Family Spends $16,297 a Year on Food.

Across Prime Minister Mark Carney's first year in office (March 2025 - February 2026), in-flight catering on the 28 official flights he took as Prime Minister cost approximately $524,815 CAD (£281,773 in the original UK media reporting). The figure was provided in writing by the Government of Canada in response to Order Paper Questions tabled by opposition Members of Parliament — meaning the number is the government's own published answer, drawn from internal expense records. Specific high-cost examples documented in the response: approximately $21,000 in catering for a two-hour flight to Washington DC in May 2025 for the Prime Minister's first meeting with U.S. President Donald Trump; approximately $159,000 in catering for a combined visit to the United Arab Emirates and the G20 summit in Johannesburg; and an October 2025 flight where the refreshments cost approximately eleven times the fuel costs for that journey for 55 delegates. For comparison: Statistics Canada's Survey of Household Spending reports the average Canadian household spent $8,659 on food from stores in 2023; Canada's Food Price Report 2024 projected a typical family of four would spend $16,297.20 annually on a healthy diet, or $339 per person per month. The Carney flight-catering total therefore equals roughly 60 family-of-four annual healthy-diet budgets, or 32 average household annual grocery bills. This article documents the proactive-disclosure record, the specific high-cost flights, the family-food comparison, and the honest caveats — including the fact that "refreshments" covers the entire travelling delegation, not just the Prime Minister personally.

Parliament Audit3d ago

How a Bill Becomes Law in Canada. Every Stage, in Plain English.

https://parliamentaudit.ca/news/how-a-bill-becomes-law-in-canada-every-stage-explained

#cdnpoli #cdnmedia

How a Bill Becomes Law in Canada. Every Stage, in Plain English.

Federal legislation in Canada moves through a defined sequence: introduction (first reading), debate (second reading), detailed clause-by-clause review (committee stage), final amendments (report stage), final debate (third reading), the same sequence in the other chamber (the Senate, almost always), Royal Assent, and proclamation. This article walks every stage in plain English: what happens, who participates, what can derail a bill, and where the public can still influence the outcome before it becomes the law of the land.

Parliament AuditMay 29

Carney Signed an RCMP Cooperation Deal With China's Police Ministry — the Same Body Behind the Illegal "Police Stations" in Canada. The Agreement Is Secret.

https://parliamentaudit.ca/news/carney-rcmp-china-public-security-mou-police-stations

#cdnpoli #cdnmedia

Carney Signed an RCMP Cooperation Deal With China's Police Ministry — the Same Body Behind the Illegal "Police Stations" in Canada. The Agreement Is Secret.

In January 2026, during Prime Minister Mark Carney's state visit to Beijing, the Royal Canadian Mounted Police signed a memorandum of understanding on law-enforcement cooperation with the People's Republic of China's Ministry of Public Security (MPS). A joint statement from Carney and Chinese President Xi Jinping said the two sides "committed to strengthening law enforcement cooperation to combat corruption and transnational crimes, including telecommunication and cyber fraud and illegal synthetic drugs." The RCMP has refused to release the full text of the agreement, stating it will not do so without the agreement of China's government — drawing demands for disclosure from both the Conservative and New Democratic parties. The MPS is the same national police body whose subordinate Fuzhou Public Security Bureau operated the clandestine "overseas police service stations" that the NGO Safeguard Defenders exposed in 2022 and that the RCMP investigated in the Greater Toronto Area and in Montreal (the RCMP closed its Montreal investigation in September 2025 without charges; the two Montreal community organizations involved have sued the RCMP for defamation and contest the characterization). The cooperation agreement was signed against the backdrop of the Hogue Commission (the federal Public Inquiry into Foreign Interference), which in its January 2025 final report found the PRC to be "by far the most significant" foreign-interference threat and documented Chinese interference in the 2019 and 2021 federal elections. A former senior RCMP officer, opposition public-safety critics, and national-security commentators have characterized the secret MPS cooperation agreement as a counterintelligence and sovereignty risk. This article documents the agreement, the institutional connection to the police stations, the election-interference findings, the official threat assessment, and the criticisms — with precise attribution and the honest caveats around the un-charged community organizations.

Parliament AuditMay 28

A Canadian University Just Pledged $100 Million for 200 Indian Students. Forty First Nations Communities Are Still on Boil-Water Advisories.

https://parliamentaudit.ca/news/uoft-100m-india-scholarships-vs-first-nations-water-shortfall

#cdnpoli #cdnmedia

A Canadian University Just Pledged $100 Million for 200 Indian Students. Forty First Nations Communities Are Still on Boil-Water Advisories.

On a state visit to India that concluded on March 2, 2026, Prime Minister Mark Carney announced a series of measures to deepen the Canada-India bilateral education relationship. The most-publicized commitment was a University of Toronto pledge of up to $100 million to fund up to 200 fully-funded scholarships for Indian students — covering tuition, living expenses, and associated costs. The funding is from the University of Toronto's institutional resources, not from the federal Government of Canada's consolidated revenue fund — an important factual qualifier this article puts up front. The announcement was made during a Prime-Minister-led diplomatic mission and was a centrepiece communication of that visit. In the same six-month window, the Parliamentary Budget Officer published a formal estimate that the federal Government of Canada is underfunding the operating and maintenance costs of First Nations water-treatment infrastructure by approximately $138 million per year. As of early 2026, 40 long-term drinking-water advisories remain in place on First Nations reserves — 9 of those have been in place for more than a decade. The Auditor General has characterized Indigenous Services Canada's progress on drinking-water as "unsatisfactory." This article documents both numbers, the political moment that brought them into juxtaposition, the honest distinction between institutional and federal funding sources, and what an apples-to-apples Indigenous-spending comparison would look like.

Parliament AuditMay 27

The CRTC Just Tripled What Netflix Owes Canada — From 5% to 15%. Is It a Tax? Here's the Honest Answer.

https://parliamentaudit.ca/news/crtc-streaming-contribution-5-to-15-percent-is-it-a-tax

#cdnpoli #cdnmedia

The CRTC Just Tripled What Netflix Owes Canada — From 5% to 15%. Is It a Tax? Here's the Honest Answer.

The Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) finalized a decision on May 21, 2026 requiring foreign streaming services with more than $25 million in annual Canadian revenue to contribute 15% of those Canadian revenues to Canadian-content production funds. The rate is up from the 5% interim rate the CRTC announced in 2024. The contribution is imposed under the Online Streaming Act (Bill C-11, 2023). Affected services include Netflix, Amazon Prime Video, Disney+, Apple TV+, and Paramount+; Spotify is excluded because it is classified as audio-only rather than audiovisual. The federal government characterizes the requirement as a "regulatory contribution," not a tax — the contribution money flows to designated funds for Canadian English, French, and Indigenous content production, not to federal general revenue. Streamers (with backing from the U.S. trade representative) characterize it as a tax that will inevitably be passed to consumers through higher subscription prices. Both framings are defensible. The Constitutional law of taxation distinguishes between taxes (compulsory payments to general government revenue) and regulatory charges (compulsory payments tied to a regulated scheme); the 15% contribution is the second category, not the first. Functionally — for a household paying more for Netflix because of it — the two are indistinguishable. The article walks through who pays, who collects, where the money goes, the timeline, the legal challenges still pending in Federal Court, and the consumer-cost impact analysts expect.

Show threadThe TyeeMay 25
We aim to add 650 recurring members by June 15. 🌟 You choose the amount, cancel any time and get a tax receipt. And, back by popular demand — the Tyee hat! Plus, some other great perks. 🧢 The old models are broken, but ours works — with your support. Join Tyee Builders today. 🗞️🌱 (6 /6) #CdnMedia

Support strong, independent jo...
Support strong, independent journalism. Join me

Our democracy needs good journalism. Join me in supporting fact-based, independent journalism.

The Tyee
Show threadThe TyeeMay 25

We aim to add 650 recurring members by June 15. 🌟

You choose the amount, cancel any time and get a tax receipt. And, back by popular demand — the Tyee hat! Plus, some other great perks. 🧢

The old models are broken, but ours works — with your support.

Join Tyee Builders today. 🗞️🌱 (6 /6) #CdnMedia

https://support.thetyee.ca/?utm_source=mastodon&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=editorial

Support strong, independent journalism. Join me

Our democracy needs good journalism. Join me in supporting fact-based, independent journalism.

The Tyee
Parliament AuditMay 24

Canada Has Granted Surveillance Powers Like Bill C-22 Before. Here Is How They Were Used.

https://parliamentaudit.ca/news/bill-c-22-canadian-surveillance-history-tommy-douglas-pipeline-protesters

#cdnpoli #cdnmedia

Canada Has Granted Surveillance Powers Like Bill C-22 Before. Here Is How They Were Used.

Bill C-22's defenders argue that the bill's safeguards and stated use cases will prevent the new surveillance powers from being misused. The argument is not new. Canadians have heard versions of it before every previous expansion of federal surveillance authority, from the 1939 establishment of the RCMP Security Service through the 2015 Anti-Terrorism Act. The declassified historical record — through Access to Information releases, court orders obtained by the BC Civil Liberties Association, CBC News investigations, and the formal findings of the Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women and Girls inquiry — shows what was actually done with those powers, after the safeguards were in place. The RCMP surveilled Tommy Douglas (the founder of Medicare) for over 30 years. CSIS told police that Indigenous land defenders at Ipperwash were armed in 1995, a claim that turned out to be false, three days before an OPP officer shot Dudley George. CSIS surveilled peaceful Northern Gateway pipeline opponents and shared intelligence back to Enbridge — the company being protested. This article walks the documented record. It does not claim Bill C-22 will be used in any of these ways; it shows what HAS happened when similar latitude was granted.