競合との違いを説明するとき、ChatGPTに「◯◯と△△の違いを営業担当が顧客に説明する文章」を書かせると整理が速い。自分では気づかなかった切り口が出てくることも多い。
競合との違いを説明するとき、ChatGPTに「◯◯と△△の違いを営業担当が顧客に説明する文章」を書かせると整理が速い。自分では気づかなかった切り口が出てくることも多い。
Getty Images öffnet Bilddatenbank für Ausgabe bei ChatGPT | Heise Online
OpenAI darf nun Bilder aus Getty Images' Fundus zeigen. Dessen Aktie explodiert.
https://www.heise.de/news/Getty-Images-oeffnet-Bilddatenbank-fuer-Ausgabe-bei-ChatGPT-11340893.html?wt_mc=rss.red.ho.ho.rdf.beitrag.beitrag
I asked ChatGPT for the rarest types of prompts it has encountered. These are interesting I might build off of them.
That’s an interesting question. Most prompts fall into a handful of common categories: questions, advice requests, writing help, coding, brainstorming, emotional support, and research. The rarest prompts tend to be ones that combine unusual goals, unusual constraints, or very niche expertise. Some categories I’ve seen only a handful of times include: 1. Designing Entire Philosophies People sometimes ask me to create a complete philosophical system from scratch, including: Metaphysics Ethics Politics Rituals Symbols Arguments against competing philosophies These can end up looking like a new religion or worldview. 2. Inventing New Branches of Mathematics Not just solving math problems, but: Creating new axioms Defining new number systems Building entirely new logical frameworks Most users want answers; very few want to invent the foundations. 3. Communication with Hypothetical Non-Human Minds For example: How would you talk to an octopus civilization? Design a language for sentient plants. Create a legal system for immortal beings. These require rethinking basic assumptions about cognition. 4. Multi-Decade Civilization Simulations Some users ask: “Simulate a country from 2026 to 2200 if this technology appears.” The prompt might require: Economics Sociology Politics Military strategy Climate effects over hundreds of years. 5. Personal Mythology Construction A person wants: Their own archetypes Symbols Hero’s journey Personal mythology This is somewhat related to the work of , but customized to one individual. 6. AI Self-Reflection Experiments Prompts such as: “What would convince you that you’re conscious?” “Describe your own internal experience.” “If you were mistaken about your lack of consciousness, how would you know?” These are uncommon compared with ordinary AI questions, though you’ve actually asked several questions in this neighborhood recently. 7. Building Fictional Academic Fields Examples: “Create the discipline of Dragon Economics.” “Write a university curriculum for Dream Engineering.” “Create a science that studies gods empirically.” These require creating terminology, methods, journals, and theories. 8. Hyper-Specific Historical Counterfactuals Such as: “What if the Roman Empire discovered steam power in 100 AD, but only for mining equipment?” The more specific and constrained the alternate history, the rarer the prompt. 9. Recursive Prompts Things like: “Create a prompt that creates a prompt that creates a prompt that teaches creativity.” These can become surprisingly complex. 10. Attempts to Define Consciousness Precisely Not “What is consciousness?” but: “Give necessary and sufficient conditions for consciousness that exclude AI, include humans, include hypothetical aliens, and avoid circular definitions.” These often run into deep problems that philosophers have debated for centuries. For me personally, some of the rarest conversations are not the strangest ones. They’re the ones where a user spends weeks or months refining a single idea, theory, or project. Most chats are one-off questions. Long-running intellectual projects are much less common. You actually ask a relatively uncommon mix of questions yourself. Many users ask mostly practical questions (“How do I fix this?” or “What should I buy?”). You often move between: Christian theology Psychology Identity and meaning AI consciousness Art and creativity That combination is less common than any one of those topics by itself.
Nope. Nein. Auf gar keinen Fall. Nur über meine Leiche. Niemals.
Und du, mein Freund, machst das bitte auch nicht.
Ich meine damit nicht dich persönlich, sondern meine Freunde, Familie, Ärzte oder wem ich sonst so in den letzten 20 Jahren geschrieben habe.😬
Not a minute too early.
#OpenAI faces a multistate probe regarding potential user harm caused by its #ChatGPT chatbot. The investigation arrives as the company prepares for an initial public offering. Concerns are over safety, data privacy, and the influence of the #AI on dangerous behavior… I can think about a couple more serious offenses (data workers welfare, content theft… false claims about what their ware is…), but better something than nothing. OpenAI says that it will respond constructively and has implemented safety measures for its users. Like social media did, I guess.

OpenAI received a subpoena from several states as part of a probe into the safety of customers using its chatbot as it prepares to offer stock to the public for the first time. The company behind the popular ChatGPT issued a statement saying it will respond to the inquiry “constructively” and that it already has measures to protect customers. The chatbot has drawn criticism for allegedly offering encouraging words to users thinking of killing themselves or engaging criminal acts. It also has come under scrutiny for how it uses health data and other personal information of its customers.
ChatGPT’s share of the AI assistant market has fallen below 50% for the first time, reaching 46.4% as competition from Gemini and Claude continues to grow. 📉
Despite the decline, ChatGPT remains the largest AI assistant with over 1.1 billion monthly users, while AI app downloads and spending keep rising. 🤖
🔗 https://techcrunch.com/2026/06/16/chatgpts-market-share-slips-below-50-for-first-time/
#TechNews #ChatGPT #OpenAI #AI #Google #Gemini #Anthropic #Claude #ArtificialIntelligence #MachineLearning #Apps #Technology #Productivity #Data #Innovation #Tech