I keep hearing the argument that if we tax business capital gains the same as income, people won't have the incentive to start businesses. I don't understand how an argument like this, which doesn't withstand a few moments of scrutiny, has been getting so much airtime. So let's give it that scrutiny.
For simplicity's sake, let's divide people who are considering starting a business into two camps: "be my own boss" and "get filthy rich".
The "be my own boss" entrepreneur is aiming to make a living through their business. Most of what they're looking for is a regular income, which is taxed as regular income tax (they also get fairly generous tax concessions as part of being a business owner). If they sell their business, they can make a very tidy profit and still be under CGT small business cap (potentially enough to never have to work again if well invested and they are willing to live within their means).
The "get filthy rich" entrepreneur is aiming to build a large business and have access to a massive amount of capital to do with what they will at the end of it (live large, have intergenerational wealth, make more money, give it all away). They are only affected if they sell their (share of their) business. When these people sell, they will pay significantly more tax without the discount than with it, but they will still end up significantly more than they could possibly accumulate as even a very well paid wage earner in that time.
The incentives for either type of entrepreneur don't change. There is no situation under the changed CGT arrangement where it made sense for someone to start a business (instead of taking a wage) before the budget changes take effect but not after. Yet people who should know better are continuing to spread this ridiculous talking point unchallenged.
#auspol #cgtdiscount #Budget2026