Just ported 5 of the #biblatex compound numeric styles. I've not tested them myself, and I'm pretty far from a #chemist.

Would be cool if people who actually use these sorts of styles could test and report.

https://github.com/citum/citum-core/commit/93c4d5e684948c610f847a68b38e2c9faae8094c

feat(styles): add 5 numeric-compound styles · citum/citum-core@93c4d5e

Adds the first styles exercising the compound-numeric feature (csl26-zafv). All styles enable options.bibliography.compound- numeric for set-based compound citation grouping. - numeric-comp: gener...

GitHub

Another new feature I've just added to #citum is compound citations that I guess are common in chemistry.

https://docs.citum.org/examples.html#compound-numeric-sets

This is feature requested for CSL awhile back that we had no idea how to implement, and in retrospect would have been impossible given the dependence on processor behavior.

https://github.com/citation-style-language/schema/issues/437

Looking for a clean solution, this is another case where I drew inspiration from #biblatex.

Examples | Citum

Compare BibTeX and BibLaTeX for LaTeX bibliography management, covering architecture, features, performance, and best practices for modern and legacy workflows.

#BibTeX #BibLaTeX #Biber #LaTeX #bibliography management

https://dasroot.net/posts/2026/02/latex-bibliography-bibtex-vs-biblatex-comparison/

LaTeX Bibliography Management: BibTeX vs BibLaTeX Comparison

Compare BibTeX and BibLaTeX for LaTeX bibliography management, covering architecture, features, performance, and best practices for modern and legacy workflows.

Technical news about AI, coding and all

Happy Holidays!

Here is a late present for you: We just released Version 6.0.alpha4.
This release contains a couple of UX improvements, a handful of new features, and the usual bug fixes.
A brand new feature is now the support for date groups based on any date field. Also supports year, timestamp fields, etc.

For more info, check out our blog post and the changelog!

https://blog.jabref.org/2025/12/26/JabRef6-0-alpha4/

#javafx #java #academia #opensource #bibliography #biblatex #bibtex #texlaTeX
@foojay @frankdelporte

For all the flak we give #ACM over many many things, the `acmart.cls` with its support for #biblatex/#natbib is truly a gift to researchers writing.

Parenthetical citations are not nouns! Textual citations, however, are!

The same can be said for #OASIcs enabling support for #natbib at least.

#LNCS on the other hand...I do not want to use a third party bst file... nor an unsupported biblatex model...

FYI: I put my #BibLaTeX #bibliography for my #cryptography #pqc #matrix #mls talks online

it's sorted by talk/topic and mostly compled from #ArXiv and google scholar

https://codeberg.org/0xKaishakunin/Publikationen/src/branch/main/Bibliographien

Publikationen

Vortragsfolien und Veröffentlichungen

Codeberg.org

Beginning to lose my mind again about #TeXLaTeX #BibLaTeX #BibTeX #Zotero fuckery. 😩

Zotero puts the "Extra" field from the GUI into the `annotation` field. This is happily ignored by biblatex. The quest begins, how to convince biblatex to *please* display my note on this preprint somewhere. All my attempts involving AtEveryBibItem or DeclareSourceMap pretty much in vain. LaTeX is so incredibly brilliant, but simple stuff like this can really kill you. Feels like  #NixOS 😅

#PhDLife

For some reason it is ridiculously hard to just ignore any first or given names with #BibLaTeX. Like any sane person, I'd like to only see surnames in the citations, authoryear style. BibLaTeX really doesn't want you to.

#TeXLaTeX

Did you know the #SILE #digitalTypesetting system supports a fairly decent subset of #BibTeX / #BibLaTeX and Citation Style Language for bibliographies? True, it's a work in progress, but with some fixes just proposed upstream, it gets better at the task.

A question to the academic #HiveMind:

We are currently developing an extension to #ConfTool that will allow for the export of conference programmes as #BibTeX / #BibLaTeX . What would be your entry type of choice for otherwise unpublished conference presentations, posters etc.?

If you opt for “something else“, please provide your preference in a reply. Any comments are more than welcome.

#DigitalHumanities #DH #FieldSurveys

@NFDI4Memory @nfdi4objects @nfdi4culture @Textplus

unpublished
42.9%
misc
35.7%
something else
21.4%
Poll ended at .