AI is changing how research is accessed, but are our infrastructures ready?
OpenAIRE has launched a Working Group on AI Bots and Repositories to explore:
🔹 managing bot traffic
🔹 licensing and machine-readable rights
🔹 shared monitoring approaches
🔹 new access models
🔗https://www.openaire.eu/addressing-the-impact-of-ai-bots-on-repositories-openaires-new-working-group
#OpenScience #AIinResearch #Repositories
This essay nicely encapsulated my thoughts about using "AI" in research (or in researcher training). Written from the point-of-view of astrophysics, but quite universally applicable: https://ergosphere.blog/posts/the-machines-are-fine/
"The real threat is a slow, comfortable drift toward not understanding what you're doing. Not a dramatic collapse. Not Skynet. Just a generation of researchers who can produce results but can't produce understanding."
"The failures are the curriculum. The error messages are the syllabus. Every hour you spend confused is an hour you spend building the infrastructure inside your own head that will eventually let you do original work. There is no shortcut through that process that doesn't leave you diminished on the other side."
AI in Research: From Question to Publication
https://fed.brid.gy/r/https://www.pressenza.com/2026/06/ai-in-research-from-question-to-publication/
Scientists are warning that academic publishing needs urgent reform in order to retain trust in the research system. Ian Sample tells Madeleine Finlay what has gone so wrong, and Dr Mark Hanson of the University of Exeter proposes some potential solutions Quality of scientific papers questioned as academics ‘overwhelmed’ by the millions published Is the staggeringly profitable business of scientific publishing bad for science? Continue reading...
Scientists are warning that academic publishing needs urgent reform in order to retain trust in the research system. Ian Sample tells Madeleine Finlay what has gone so wrong, and Dr Mark Hanson of the University of Exeter proposes some potential solutions Quality of scientific papers questioned as academics ‘overwhelmed’ by the millions published Is the staggeringly profitable business of scientific publishing bad for science? Continue reading...
Scientists are warning that academic publishing needs urgent reform in order to retain trust in the research system. Ian Sample tells Madeleine Finlay what has gone so wrong, and Dr Mark Hanson of the University of Exeter proposes some potential solutions Quality of scientific papers questioned as academics ‘overwhelmed’ by the millions published Is the staggeringly profitable business of scientific publishing bad for science? Continue reading...
2% of ICML papers desk rejected because the authors used LLM in their reviews
https://blog.icml.cc/2026/03/18/on-violations-of-llm-review-policies/
#HackerNews #ICML2023 #LLM #Ethics #ResearchPublishing #AIinResearch #DeskRejection
OpenAIRE
Bjørn Sætrevik
%%sitename%% [Unofficial]
Datendealerin 🌲☕
N-gated Hacker News
purescience_news
Hacker News
Harald Klinke