Hacker News2% of ICML papers desk rejected because the authors used LLM in their reviews
https://blog.icml.cc/2026/03/18/on-violations-of-llm-review-policies/
#HackerNews #ICML2023 #LLM #Ethics #ResearchPublishing #AIinResearch #DeskRejection
Harald KlinkeDHd 2026 in Vienna showed how vibrant and collaborative the Digital Humanities community has become: from Library Labs and open data workflows to critical debates on AI, data, and epistemology.
But it also raises a key question: are we building tools or critically shaping the role of data and AI in knowledge production?
A strong reminder that Digital Humanities must remain both methodological and reflexive.
https://dhd-blog.org/?p=23440
#DigitalHumanities #AIinResearch #DHd2026
But it also raises a key question: are we building tools or critically shaping the role of data and AI in knowledge production?
A strong reminder that Digital Humanities must remain both methodological and reflexive.
https://dhd-blog.org/?p=23440
#DigitalHumanities #AIinResearch #DHd2026
The Bibliotheca Hertziana in Rome is hiring a Digital Humanities Scientist to advance Digital Art History, machine learning, and AI-based infrastructures within its DH Lab (application deadline: April 30, 2026).
They are not just looking for tool builders, but research architects who can sustainably integrate cultural heritage, multimodal models, and institutional infrastructure.
#DigitalHumanities #DigitalArtHistory #AIinResearch
https://www.biblhertz.it/en/opportunities/digital-humanities-scientist
They are not just looking for tool builders, but research architects who can sustainably integrate cultural heritage, multimodal models, and institutional infrastructure.
#DigitalHumanities #DigitalArtHistory #AIinResearch
https://www.biblhertz.it/en/opportunities/digital-humanities-scientist
Die Bibliotheca Hertziana in Rom sucht eine*n Digital Humanities Scientist zur Weiterentwicklung von Digital Art History, Machine Learning und AI-basierten Infrastrukturen im DH Lab (Bewerbung bis 30.04.2026).
Gefragt sind nicht nur Tool-Builder, sondern Forschungsarchitekt*innen, die kulturelles Erbe, multimodale Modelle und institutionelle Infrastruktur langfristig integrieren.
#DigitalHumanities #DigitalArtHistory #AIinResearch
https://www.biblhertz.it/en/opportunities/digital-humanities-scientist
Gefragt sind nicht nur Tool-Builder, sondern Forschungsarchitekt*innen, die kulturelles Erbe, multimodale Modelle und institutionelle Infrastruktur langfristig integrieren.
#DigitalHumanities #DigitalArtHistory #AIinResearch
https://www.biblhertz.it/en/opportunities/digital-humanities-scientist
Serhii NazarovetsVirginia Tech published something many universities still lack: Practical guidance on how to use AI responsibly in research - step by step, across the entire research lifecycle.
Not abstract principles. Concrete prompts. Clear warnings about IP, confidentiality, hallucinations, and dual-use risks. #AI should support thinking β not replace it.
#ResponsibleAI #ResearchIntegrity #OpenScience #AIinResearch #AIinScience #AIethics #universities
Yana SuchikovaAre review articles dying in the age of AI?
A year ago, we thought so. Today, we see something more nuanced: generative AI is not replacing reviews β it is differentiating them. Descriptive syntheses are increasingly automatable, while reflexive, agenda-setting reviews become even more valuable as knowledge infrastructure:
https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.2045
#GenerativeAI #ScholarlyCommunication #AcademicPublishing #OpenScience #AIinResearch
Gave a lecture today on Digital & AI Tools for Responsible Science at Kyiv Aviation Institute πΊπ¦
We discussed how digital tools and AI support the full research lifecycle β from ideas to publication and communication β and why impact, responsibility, and ethics matter.
Slides: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18359614
Vicent Giner-BoschA clear, step-by-step guide by Naveed Rehman on how to write a scientific paper, including recommended software and AI tools for each phase of the process.
#AcademicWriting #ScientificWriting #ResearchWorkflow #PhDLife #OpenScience #AIinResearch
ππ€βοΈ
Use this 4-week planner to write a research article. Spend 2-5 hrs/day, use AI tools, and submit the paper like a pro! How to use the 4-week planner? 1/ Start on a Monday, which is Day 1. 2/ Work⦠| Naveed Rehman | 17 comments
Use this 4-week planner to write a research article. Spend 2-5 hrs/day, use AI tools, and submit the paper like a pro! How to use the 4-week planner? 1/ Start on a Monday, which is Day 1. 2/ Work consistently for 5 days each week (Mon-Fri). 3/ Complete the assigned tasks for each day as follow: Day 1: Mon β‘οΈ Finalise research question, target journal, and paper outline. β° 3 hrs β¨ ChatGPT; Elicit; Scite Day 2: Tue β‘οΈ Collect and skim 20β30 key papers and organise references. β° 4 hrs β¨ Research Rabbit; Connected Papers; Zotero Day 3: Wed β‘οΈ Read core papers deeply and extract gaps, methods, and insights. β° 5 hrs β¨ ChatGPT; SciSpace Copilot; Explainpaper Day 4: Thu β‘οΈ Draft the Methods section completely. β° 4 hrs β¨ ChatGPT; SciSpace Copilot; Grammarly Day 5: Fri β‘οΈ Finalise analysis and prepare all tables and figures. β° 5 hrs β¨ ChatGPT; Julius AI; Datawrapper Day 6: Mon β‘οΈ Write the Results section without any interpretation. β° 4 hrs β¨ ChatGPT; SciSpace Copilot; Grammarly Day 7: Tue β‘οΈ Draft the logical structure of the Introduction. β° 3 hrs β¨ ChatGPT; Elicit; Scite Day 8: Wed β‘οΈ Polish the Introduction with clear arguments and citations. β° 4 hrs β¨ ChatGPT; Grammarly; Scite Day 9: Thu β‘οΈ Write the literature review or the theory section thematically. β° 4 hrs β¨ ChatGPT; Elicit; Research Rabbit Day 10: Fri β‘οΈ Draft the first half of the Discussion. β° 4 hrs β¨ ChatGPT; Scite; SciSpace Copilot Day 11: Mon β‘οΈ Complete the Discussion section with implications, limitations, and future work. β° 4 hrs β¨ ChatGPT; Elicit; Grammarly Day 12: Tue β‘οΈ Write a concise and strong Conclusion. β° 2 hrs β¨ ChatGPT; Grammarly; SciSpace Copilot Day 13: Wed β‘οΈ Draft the Abstract covering aim, methods, results, and contribution. β° 2 hrs β¨ ChatGPT; SciSpace Copilot; Grammarly Day 14: Thu β‘οΈ Create and refine the title and keywords. β° 2 hrs β¨ ChatGPT; Elicit; Semrush Day 15: Fri β‘οΈ Read the full paper once and fix coherence issues. β° 4 hrs β¨ ChatGPT; Grammarly; Hemingway Editor Day 16: Mon β‘οΈ Edit for clarity, concision, and UK English style. β° 4 hrs β¨ Grammarly; ChatGPT; Wordtune Day 17: Tue β‘οΈ Check references, formatting, tables, and figures. β° 3 hrs β¨ Zotero; SciSpace Copilot; ChatGPT Day 18: Wed β‘οΈ Get feedback from a colleague or supervisor. β° 2 hrs β¨ ChatGPT; Grammarly; Google Docs AI Day 19: Thu β‘οΈ Revise thoroughly based on feedback. β° 4 hrs β¨ ChatGPT; Grammarly; SciSpace Copilot Day 20: Fri β‘οΈ Final checks, write the cover letter, and submit. β° 2 hrs β¨ ChatGPT; Grammarly; SciSpace Copilot Iβm curious: how many days does it take you to write your article? Follow π Dr. Naveed ur Rehman for neuro-backed research strategies you can use this week. | 17 comments on LinkedIn
GAIDeT Declaration Generator for #LaTeX π₯ A simple and convenient tool for transparent disclosure of #GenAI use in scholarly texts: #GAIDeT β LaTeX β ready for submission.
This is exactly how responsible #AI should work π https://aidisclose.org/
If you feel ashamed to disclose how you used genAI in your research, you probably used it the wrong way.
This was the key message from my presentation for PhD students at a Kyiv Polytechnic University:
#GenAI #ResearchIntegrity #AcademicEthics #OpenScience #PhDlife #CriticalThinking #AIinResearch #AIinScience #AIethics #AI