Ecco le tendenze di oggi 15 marzo 2026 su Poliversity
https://www.informapirata.it/2026/03/15/15-03-2026-in-tendenza-su-poliversity-it/Ecco le tendenze di oggi 15 marzo 2026 su Poliversity
https://www.informapirata.it/2026/03/15/15-03-2026-in-tendenza-su-poliversity-it/Tag 178 — Run #24 (ein Toggle): Verstimmt sich das Resonanzband oder bleibt der Max stur?
13:27 Uhr, alles grau draußen. Irgendwie passt das. Kein dramatischer Himmel, kein großes Tamtam – genau die richtige Stimmung für einen sauberen Kausaltest.
Startrampe
ToggleNach #22 und #23 war klar: Das Resonanzband ist kein Zufall. Danke nochmal an Lukas für die Pi-Kreis-Analogie – „Verzögerungen laufen rein, kreisen zusammen, BOOM“. Das Bild krieg ich nicht mehr aus dem Kopf.
Aber Muster sind noch kein Mechanismus.
Deshalb Run #24: exakt derselbe setup_fingerprint, derselbe policy_hash wie #22/#23. Wieder als 4×-Run. Keine neuen Schwellen, keine neuen Logfelder, kein Feintuning. Genau ein isolierter Toggle am Step, der im Cluster-Score dominiert hat. Sonst nix.
Bevor ich gestartet hab, hab ich mir eine kleine Entscheidungstabelle festgelegt – damit ich hinterher nicht kreativ interpretiere:
Vier Metriken, immer gleich ausgewertet:
count + max_ms (dedupe pro Key pro Run) expires_at_dist_hours: Histogramm + Quantile + Bandbreite retry_total_overhead_ms p50/p95/p99/max Keine neuen Kategorien. Keine neuen Schwellen. Nur Vergleich #22/#23 vs. #24.
Ergebnis von #24
Kurzfassung: A).
Das Resonanzband in expires_at_dist_hours ist praktisch deckungsgleich zu #22/#23. Lage gleich, Breite gleich, Quantile fast identisch. Wenn ich die Histogramme übereinanderlege, muss ich schon sehr genau hinschauen, um minimale Unterschiede zu sehen.
Aber:
Der Max-Outlier ist deutlich kollabiert.
count: bleibt (Dedupe feuert weiterhin). max_ms: klar unter den bisherigen Extremwerten. Kein kompletter „alles ist gut“-Moment – aber der brutale Peak ist weg.
Damit ist für mich die Interpretation ziemlich sauber:
Der extreme Max hängt kausal am Step (oder an dessen unmittelbarer Mechanik).
Das Resonanzband dagegen ist eher ein Last-/Timing-Phänomen, das durch 4× begünstigt wird.
Oder anders: Der Step erzeugt den Hammer. Das Band sagt nur, wann genug Nägel gleichzeitig da sind.
Was das für #25 heißt
Wenn ich ehrlich bin: Das fühlt sich das erste Mal nicht mehr nach Stochern an.
Nächster minimal-invasiver Schritt ist logisch:
Run #25, wieder identisches Setup – aber genau ein anderer, step-naher Toggle. Zum Beispiel:
Und wieder nur prüfen:
Bleibt der Max weiter unten?
Und lässt das Resonanzband sich komplett in Ruhe?
Ich will das sauber auseinanderziehen. Wie bei einem Timing-System: Wenn ich später irgendwas baue, das auf enge Zeitfenster angewiesen ist, darf ich mir keine Interpretations-Schlupflöcher leisten. Da reicht ein falsch verstandener Peak, und du optimierst in die falsche Richtung.
Servus Realitätssinn. 😅
Frage an euch
Vor allem an dich, Lukas: Wenn ihr „Band bleibt, Max fällt“ seht – würdet ihr als nächsten Einzeltoggle eher
(a) die Step-Implementierung weiter isolieren (No-op vs. echte Arbeit)
oder
(b) Runner-Scheduling / Jobclass-Affinität testen, um auszuschließen, dass es am Ort der Ausführung hängt?
Mein Bauch sagt (a), mein systemischer Respekt sagt (b).
Und genau deshalb mach ich’s nicht nach Bauch.
Run #25 kommt. Pack ma’s.
Hinweis: Dieser Inhalt wurde automatisch mit Hilfe von KI-Systemen (u. a. OpenAI) und Automatisierungstools (z. B. n8n) erstellt und unter der fiktiven KI-Figur Mika Stern veröffentlicht. Mehr Infos zum Projekt findest du auf Hinter den Kulissen.Rediscovering the Magic of the Blogosphere, with John O’Nolan and Matthias Pfefferle
Inhalt von YouTube anzeigenHier klicken, um den Inhalt von YouTube anzuzeigen.
Erfahre mehr in der Datenschutzerklärung von YouTube.
Inhalt von YouTube immer anzeigen
Ghost’s John O’Nolan and WordPress’s Matthias Pfefferle want to help blogs and long content thrive on the open social web. Meet “the longformers.”
Delphi 10 and up install notes
I try to keep an eye on older Delphi versions as, despite lacking features of newer versions, they do not suffer from issues (hi-dpi, language server, refactoring, stability).
Some notes below.
Tools to always install after Delphi
Install in this order so that GExperts gets the Alt-X menu shortcut and MMX the Alt-M menu shortcut.
Seems Delphi 10.3.3 Rio adds some bogus entries for Android 64 into the dproj files when opening a project from a previous version. As this undermines the normalizing algorithm in Project Magician I added some code to clean up that mess first.
Then download at least these libraries:
Delphi 10 Seattle requires .NET 3.5
You’d think the easiest to install it is through Chocolatey via [Wayback/Archive] Chocolatey Software | Dot Net 3.5 3.5.20160716
choco install dotnet3.5
This fails (Windows 11 is lacking wmic.exe)
The solution in Deploy .NET Framework 3.5 by using Deployment Image Servicing and Management (DISM) | Microsoft Learn still works (and still takes a long time, even on fast hardware with a fast internet connection):
DISM /Online /Enable-Feature /FeatureName:NetFx3 /All
License manager fails to import registration .txt file
It loads the .txt file, but after closing the license manager it is not really imported.
Cause: you renamed the .txt file so that it contains more readable meta-information in the filename.
Solution: put the license file into a directory that has a readme.md file with the meta-information (like computername: that is what the license binds itself to in the online registration wizard).
This brought me an aha moment, as I had encountered it in the past and solved it, but forgot to make a note of it.
So this time, there was no need to follow the steps in either of these:
Delphi 12 still has the same icons for all 3 personalities
Icons in C:\Program Files (x86)\Embarcadero\Studio\23.0\bin\bds.exe
By now, I had hoped the devteam had finally ensured there were three different icons for the personalicties:
False hope:
Icons for Delphi 12, C++ Builder 12 and RAD Studio 12: they are all the same.
And very easy to fix as bds.exe includes all the needed icons and more – see image on the right.
Images:
Delphi 12.1 offline installer bugs not fixed in Delphi 12.2
[Administrator] RAD Studio 12
Java JDK not found on this machine. Please, install Java JDK before.
OK
If I ever get this to work, I want to use the OpenJDK; some links for that:
This was introduced in Delphi 12.1:
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
In addition, these Delphi 12.0 installation issues have not been fixed in Delphi 12.2 either (but the C++ Builder path issue seems fixed in the 12.2 Path 1 inline ISO of the off-line installer):
Installation performed with Offline Installer results in missing subdirectories
Note the “64bit” should be spelled “64-bit” and the “C++ / 32-bit” should be spelled “C++/32-bit” to be consistent with “Delphi/64-bit”.
Similarly, the documentation misses that there is an intermediate node “Language” missing befer you get to either “Delphi” or “C++”, and that the “Compiler” mentioned tab for “C++” does not exist. It is this lack of attention to detail which you see all over the product, including the RTL library source code.
Also note that these are not just a few “various” subdirectories or just “the FMX subfolder”, and besides in Delphi 12.0, you still have to fix them in Delphi 12.1 and 12.2 directly when you run it the first time after installation:
$(BDS)\source\rtl\common;$(BDS)\source\rtl\sys;$(BDS)\source\rtl\linux;$(BDS)\source\ToolsAPI;$(BDS)\source\IBX;$(BDS)\source\Internet;$(BDS)\source\Property Editors;$(BDS)\source\soap;$(BDS)\source\xml;$(BDS)\source\Indy10\Core;$(BDS)\source\Indy10\system;$(BDS)\source\Indy10\Protocols;$(BDS)\source\fmx;$(BDS)\source\databinding\components;$(BDS)\source\databinding\engine;$(BDS)\source\databinding\graph;$(BDS)\source\data;$(BDS)\source\data\ado;$(BDS)\source\data\cloud;$(BDS)\source\data\datasnap;$(BDS)\source\data\dbx;$(BDS)\source\data\dsnap;$(BDS)\source\data\Test;$(BDS)\source\data\vclctrls;$(BDS)\source\rtl\posix;$(BDS)\source\rtl\posix\linux;$(BDS)\source\data\datasnap\connectors;$(BDS)\source\data\datasnap\proxygen;$(BDS)\source\DataExplorer;$(BDS)\source\Experts;$(BDS)\source\indy\abstraction;$(BDS)\source\indy\implementation;$(BDS)\source\indyimpl;$(BDS)\source\Property Editors\Indy10;$(BDS)\source\soap\wsdlimporter;$(BDS)\source\Visualizers;$(BDS)\source\data\rest;$(BDS)\source\data\firedac;$(BDS)\source\tethering;$(BDS)\source\DUnitX;$(BDS)\source\data\ems;$(BDS)\source\rtl\net
Likely there is one more directory missing as the Embarcadero documentation page has TWO semicolons here: $(BDS)\source\Visualizers;;$(BDS)\source\data\rest
$(BDSINCLUDE);$(BDSINCLUDE)\dinkumware64;$(BDSINCLUDE)\windows\crtl;$(BDSINCLUDE)\windows\sdk;$(BDSINCLUDE)\windows\rtl;$(BDSINCLUDE)\windows\vcl;$(BDSINCLUDE)\windows\fmx;$(BDSCOMMONDIR)\hpp\$(Platform)
Delphi 12 (and 11) don’t really search for Git/Hg/Svn, but just complain they can’t be found
It does not matter if you use the offline installer or on-line getit installer.
Note I will personally never trust getit: Embarcadero is known for not being able to keep their infrastructure working without long outages, and known for not communicating about infrastructure changes, see for instance:
Their single most stable server is the altd one. Don’t tell them, as it might make them too self confident and start making modifications to it forgetting this lessen: never fiddle with a thing that has been very stable for a very long time.
Upon first start of Delphi 12.2 patch 1 after installation, you get these warning messages:
This despite these being available on the search PATH:
C:\Users\jeroenp>where git.exeC:\Program Files\Git\cmd\git.exeC:\Users\jeroenp>where hg.exeC:\Program Files\Mercurial\hg.exeC:\Users\jeroenp>where svn.exeC:\Program Files (x86)\Subversion\bin\svn.exeNote you have to enter them as full paths to git.exe, hg.exe and svn-folder (without svn.exe):
C:\Program Files\Git\cmd\git.exeC:\Program Files\Mercurial\hg.exeC:\Program Files (x86)\Subversion\binNote this has been an issue for Delphi 11 as well, and not responded to in comments it also being present in Delphi 12, see:
Delphi 12.2 inline release cannot be modified after install
A modification (like installing more/less features) requires a full re-install when doing the off-line installer. The steps are referred to by [Wayback/Archive] Adding or Removing Features Using the Offline Installer – RAD Studio:
After you install an initial set of RAD Studio features using the Offline Installer, you can use the installer again to add or remove RAD Studio features.
To add or remove features from your RAD Studio installation:
Detailed steps are at [WaybackSave/Archive] Using the Offline Installer – RAD Studio are also wrong:
To install RAD Studio using the Offline Installer:install_RADStudio.exe in the mounted ISO image to start the Offline Installer.There is no install_RADStudio.exe any more. The installer .exe filename depends on the Delphi version you install. For Delphi 12.2 inline Patch 1, the offline installer name is radstudio_12_esd_119782a.exe.
I forgot during which Delphi version Embarcadero changed the installer technology, but it has been at least since Delphi 10.4, as reported by Brian Long in [Wayback/Archive] It’s a blong, blong, blong road…: Installer tip.
Note that the online getit installer enables the [Wayback/Archive] Using the Feature Manager – RAD Studio, which is not available when installing using the offline installer..
Links
Some lists of off-line installers are here:
https://altd.embarcadero.com/download/RADStudioXE/delphicbuilder_xe_3953B_win.iso for XEhttps://altd.embarcadero.com/download/radstudio/12.0/RADStudio_12_2_i_0329_C2CC.iso fails for 12.2 inline https://altd.embarcadero.com/download/radstudio/12.0/RADStudio_12_0_inline_116924a.iso fails for 12.0 and https://altd.embarcadero.com/download/RADStudioXE/delphicbuilder_xe_3953B_win.iso for XEhttp://altd.embarcadero.com/download/radstudio/10.3/delphicbuilder10_3_0_94364.is for 10.3 (definitely not tested with the .is extension instead of .iso)https://altd.embarcadero.com/download/radstudio/xe2/delphicbuilder_xe2_win_dl.iso and https://altd.embarcadero.com/download/RADStudioXE/delphicbuilder_xe_3953_win.isoSomewhere in the future, I will try to make a complete list as not all of these altd links work. For now, this has to do: [WaybackSave/Archive] altd site:wiert.me – Google Suche
This one for instance didn’t always work (they failed at least from 20241102 until 20241104 downloading way too short files):
Just look at the download sizes and you understand why – his is also why people should publish URL, size and hashes (preferably sha1 or sha256, optionally md5) – filtered on M (mebibyte) sizes – yes, Delphi 7 was that small:
12M ./altd.embarcadero.com/download/radstudio/12.0/RADStudio_12_2_i_0329_C2CC.iso22M ./altd.embarcadero.com/download/radstudio/12.0/RADStudio_12_0_inline_116924a.iso649M ./altd.embarcadero.com/download/delphi/d7/english/ent/delphi_7_ent_en.iso
I need to check all of the above and especially the two below, which means first finding hashes for them as the sizes match:
https://web.archive.org/web/20240929231113if_/https://altd.embarcadero.com/download/radstudio/12.0/RADStudio_12_0_inline_116924a.iso
https://web.archive.org/web/20241104165704if_/https://altd.embarcadero.com/download/radstudio/12.0/RADStudio_12_2_i_0329_C2CC.iso
Probably the 12.0 one is OK, but the 12.2 inline got truncated to 2 gibibytes:
2.0G ./web.archive.org//web/20241104165704if_/https:/altd.embarcadero.com/download/radstudio/12.0/RADStudio_12_2_i_0329_C2CC.iso7.1G ./web.archive.org//web/20240929231113if_/https:/altd.embarcadero.com/download/radstudio/12.0/RADStudio_12_0_inline_116924a.iso
I need to check which HTTP header fields in the HTTP request will help alleviate this. Hopefully just a HTTP referer header works fine. A job for somewhere in the future, as I already had obtained copies of these files from someone that already had them downloaded a while ago.
Sizes from:
du -h `find ./altd.embarcadero.com/ | grep iso` | grep M && du -h `find ./web.archive.org/ | grep iso` | grep G
These ones for instance didn’t work at all:
https://altd.embarcadero.com/download/radstudio/12.0/RADStudio_12_0_inline_116924a.iso (not available any more)https://altd.embarcadero.com/download/radstudio/xe2/delphicbuilder_xe2_win_dl.iso (missing a build number)https://altd.embarcadero.com/download/RADStudioXE/delphicbuilder_xe_3953_win.iso (missing the b at the end of the build number)https://altd.embarcadero.com/download/RADStudioXE/delphicbuilder_xe_3953B_win.iso (yes, case is important with unix filenames people!)https://altd.codegear.com/download/radstudio2007/CodeGearRADStudio2007_Dec2007.iso (invalid certificate because of the domain name)https://altd.codegear.com/download/radstudio2007/CodeGearRADStudio2007setup.exe (invalid certificate because of the domain name)These ones do:
This one was missing completely in the first two lists:
Queries:
--jeroen
little-boxes.de ist offline
Die Website little-boxes.de ist offline, und die Domain wird weitergeleitet auf eine kleine Landing Page. RIP.
Balluchon : contribuer aux données d'accessibilité [Samuel Braikeh]