HorschtelRE: https://suma-ev.social/@osf/116143032854409070
vieleicht helfen die Tags:
#suchmaschine #osi #owi #internet #google #bing #yahoo #qwant
zu etwas mehr Reichweite im Fediverse
Andreas WagnerGerade diskutiert @spinfocl die verschiedenen Aspekte von Offenheit bei LLMs: Gewichte, Inferencing Code, Trainingsdaten, Trainingslogik.
https://opensource.org/ai/open-source-ai-definition
https://isitopen.ai/
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2405.15802
https://doi.org/10.1145/3630106.3659005
Lars Marowsky-Brée 😷@tante The "Open Source AI Definition" was the final straw for me to recognize OSI for what they are (at least have become): a capitalist apologist shill group.
I do not like that this is true.
HabrРазбираемся с форвардингом IP-пакетов в сетевых уровнях L2 и L3
Передача пакетов внутри компьютерных сетей осуществляется на различных уровнях иерархической модели OSI. В этой статье мы будем говорить о, пожалуй, самых сетевых (помимо транспортного) уровнях в этой модели: канальном (L2) и сетевом (L3). Мы рассмотрим, как осуществляется передача пакетов как внутри сетевых сегментов, так и при межсетевом взаимодействии. Выделим различия и покажем ключевые моменты процесса перенаправления трафика в сетях. Разобраться в теме
https://habr.com/ru/companies/otus/articles/1000638/
#l2 #l3 #osi #osi_layers #форвардинг_пакетов #модель_OSI #маршрутизация_IP
Feike 🇪🇺🇳🇱 🚫👑
Tommaso GagliardoniGreen, open and ethical? Chinese propaganda in Infomaniak's Euria, and a reflection on the role of Open Source AI: https://gagliardoni.net/#20260208_euria
Infomaniak is a Swiss alternative to Big Tech, but focusing specifically on digital sovereignty for the Swiss and EU markets. Like too many others, they couldn't resist shoving AI down their customers' throats. So, last December they launched Euria, touted as "the free, sovereign AI assistant to no longer depend on the American giants". The road to Hell is paved with good intentions: as you can see, their model is heavily infused with Chinese state censorship. In this blog post I explain why and what the broader consequences are for "open source AI".
#ai #euria #infomaniak #switzerland #eu #bigtech #llm #china #usa #qwen #censorship #digitalsovereignty #opensource #foss #floss #osi #tienanmen #politics
T_X
Giacomo Tesio@andre123@snowfan.it
#Minix è #OpenSource.
Il che è un po' parte del problema, perché il kernel e quasi tutto lo userspace (portato da #NetBSD) è sotto licenze permissive che non richiedono reciprocità.
Urge andare un po' oltre la retorica dell'open source che, con buona pace di #Stallman, è nato per permettere lo sfuttamento gratuito del lavoro altamente specializzato di volontari.
La storia di Minix dimostra che se l'europa si limitasse a soddisfare la definizione di open source dell'#OSI, fornirebbe semplicemente lavoro gratuito ai concorrenti stranieri.
Per evitare la "Tragedy of the (unprotected) commons" bisogna riscoprire il lavoro di Elinor Ostrom ed creare dei beni comuni protetti, in cui la totale reciprocità sia condizione al loro utilizzo.
Un #copyleft più forte della #AGPL per intenderci.
Un cambio di rotta (e retorica) ancora tabù, nonostante decenni di #SaaSS, ancor prima dei #LLM e del #vibecoding, ma sempre più urgente.
@DataKnightmare@mastodon.xyz @informapirata@mastodon.uno
#Minix è #OpenSource.
Il che è un po' parte del problema, perché il kernel e quasi tutto lo userspace (portato da #NetBSD) è sotto licenze permissive che non richiedono reciprocità.
Urge andare un po' oltre la retorica dell'open source che, con buona pace di #Stallman, è nato per permettere lo sfuttamento gratuito del lavoro altamente specializzato di volontari.
La storia di Minix dimostra che se l'europa si limitasse a soddisfare la definizione di open source dell'#OSI, fornirebbe semplicemente lavoro gratuito ai concorrenti stranieri.
Per evitare la "Tragedy of the (unprotected) commons" bisogna riscoprire il lavoro di Elinor Ostrom ed creare dei beni comuni protetti, in cui la totale reciprocità sia condizione al loro utilizzo.
Un #copyleft più forte della #AGPL per intenderci.
Un cambio di rotta (e retorica) ancora tabù, nonostante decenni di #SaaSS, ancor prima dei #LLM e del #vibecoding, ma sempre più urgente.
@DataKnightmare@mastodon.xyz @informapirata@mastodon.uno
@Wuzzy@cyberplace.social
First it's important to note that over years I realized that #OSI is just a corporate (and US-led) gatekeeper organization that serve the very interests their sponsors.
You can easily see this reading their license review mailing while keeping a tab opened on the sponsors page of the day through the #WaybackMachine.
Just as a couple of example, they rejected #MongoDB's #SSPL while #Amazon was their major sponsor and adopted CAL that was way more contentious.
The last damage that OSI did to our communities has been the #Meta dictated #OSAID (OpenSource #AI Definition) better known as #OpenWashing Definition, that superseed the #OSD and does not require training data sharing, voiding the freedom to study and welcoming toxic candies within "open source" just to avoid the #AIAct requirements.
So I don't care about OSI opinion about the #HackingLicense (or about anything else).
Having said that, you are right that its first condition forbid any use of the covered work that would limit third party access or use of it.
So basically you can't use your freedom to limit the freedom of others.
Is it still a free license?
Never asked to #RMS or #FSF, but I guess that such formal constraint makes it "not free" to their eyes.
What they miss, imho, is that freedom without communion is always going to be exploited by the strongers (under #capitalism, the rich) to oppress the weakest (everybody else, the workers, the customers, the environment...) as #LLM are showing these days.
In fact the latest version of the #HackingLicense was written in response ti #GitHub #Copilot (aka #CopyALot), after it distributed #GPLv3 code from #Quake with a wrong attribution and a permissive license.
The Hacking License is a dependency inversion: if you use data or code covered by it, anything that come out can be used under such license.
First it's important to note that over years I realized that #OSI is just a corporate (and US-led) gatekeeper organization that serve the very interests their sponsors.
You can easily see this reading their license review mailing while keeping a tab opened on the sponsors page of the day through the #WaybackMachine.
Just as a couple of example, they rejected #MongoDB's #SSPL while #Amazon was their major sponsor and adopted CAL that was way more contentious.
The last damage that OSI did to our communities has been the #Meta dictated #OSAID (OpenSource #AI Definition) better known as #OpenWashing Definition, that superseed the #OSD and does not require training data sharing, voiding the freedom to study and welcoming toxic candies within "open source" just to avoid the #AIAct requirements.
So I don't care about OSI opinion about the #HackingLicense (or about anything else).
Having said that, you are right that its first condition forbid any use of the covered work that would limit third party access or use of it.
So basically you can't use your freedom to limit the freedom of others.
Is it still a free license?
Never asked to #RMS or #FSF, but I guess that such formal constraint makes it "not free" to their eyes.
What they miss, imho, is that freedom without communion is always going to be exploited by the strongers (under #capitalism, the rich) to oppress the weakest (everybody else, the workers, the customers, the environment...) as #LLM are showing these days.
In fact the latest version of the #HackingLicense was written in response ti #GitHub #Copilot (aka #CopyALot), after it distributed #GPLv3 code from #Quake with a wrong attribution and a permissive license.
The Hacking License is a dependency inversion: if you use data or code covered by it, anything that come out can be used under such license.
OSI Policy TeamThe EU's call for input on its Open Digital Ecosystem strategy got over 1600 responses, one of the highest numbers ever received.
You can read the #OSI's feedback here; We'll be sharing a blog post with you later this week that summarises it!
[jm]
#EUpol #EUOpenSourceWeek #OpenSource #OpenDigitalEcosystemStrategy #EuropeanCommission #EU